摘要
传统观点认为行政自由裁量权能且仅能通过立法和司法途径进行控制,而行政系统的内部控制则常常被忽略。实际上,立法机关在规则制定、组织构成和核心任务等方面有着相当程度的控制局限,而司法机关则在控制范围、控制成本和纠偏能力等方面存在着不足之处。相应地,行政自由裁量权的内部控制却因其内发性、专业性、同步性等特征表现出无可替代的控权优势。只有建立健全行政控制的各项机制,并将其与立法、司法控制结合起来,才能让行政自由裁量权更为健康有序地运行。
The traditional view thinks that of legislation and jurisdiction, and inner control the administrative discretion can only be controlled by the way of administration system is always neglected. Actually, the legislative organization has a quite level of controlling limitation about rule making, organization constructing, the core mission, and so on. Whereas judicial authority has been shortage of scope of controlling, controlling cost, ability of error correcting, etc.. Accordingly, the inner control of administrative discretion shows an irreplaceable advantage of control power owing to its indigenousness, professionalism, synchronism, and other characters. It can make administrative discretion operate more sound and order only to build and perfect all systems of administrative controlling, and to combine with control of legislation and jurisdiction.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期73-84,共12页
China Legal Science
