摘要
朱舜水在长崎居住期间曾与安东省庵就"朱陆问题"有深入的探讨。省庵在与舜水相遇前就对陈建的《学蔀通辨》进行过"训点",倾向于"朱是陆非"。后省庵曾就朱陆问题请教过舜水。对于作为士大夫一员并勇于承担明王朝溃败之责任的舜水来说,在思考明王朝溃败的深层原因时,能够明确指出陆象山和王阳明思想中的缺陷,应该说是一种非常深刻的问题意识。舜水不仅把阳明门下主张良知现成论的王畿等同于佛教而予以痛斥,更把东林学派的高攀龙、邹元标以及与东林学派有很深关系的刘宗周视为"道学者"而加以批判。
This paper focuses on Zhu Shunshui＇s discussions with Ando Seian on ＂the debate between Zhu Xi and Lu Xiangshan＂ during his stay in Nagasaki. Before meeting Zhu Shushui, Seian had ＂kunten-marked＂ Chen Jian＇s General Critique of the Obscuration of Learning （Xuebu tongbian） and agreed on Zhu Xi＇s view rather than Lu Xiangshang＇s. Later, he consulted Zhu Shunshui on this issue. As a scholar-bureaucrat, Zhu Shunshui had the courage to accept the responsibility for the Ming Dynasty＇s fall. In reflecting upon the deep reasons for Ming＇s failure, Zhu Shunshui was able to identify clearly the weaknesses in Lu Xiangshan and Wang Yangming＇s thoughts. This showed his profound problem consciousness. Zhu Shunshui criticized not only the proposition that Wang Ji＇s Conscience Existentialism of Yangming School was equal to Buddhism but also the idea that Donglin School＇s Gao Panlong and Zhou Yuanbiao, and Liu Zongzhou, who had deep relations with Donglin School, were ＂moralists＂.
出处
《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期8-14,共7页
Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
朱舜水
安东省庵
明末思想
Zhu Shunshui
Ando Seian
late-Ming thoughts
