摘要
公司决议效力瑕疵的"二分法"与"三分法"对于决议可撤销适用事由的解释存有差异。"三分法"逻辑下的决议可撤销适用对象得到更合乎逻辑的界定。决议可撤销、不成立与无效的制度价值各异,严格区分三者的适用对象的难点是决议程序瑕疵的效力。属于决议可撤销的程序瑕疵严格限定在足够严重但又不足以导致决议不成立的法定事由。在此原则框架下,适用决议可撤销的程序瑕疵情形得以深入讨论。
Under the different frames of double-division and triple-division on defective corporate decisions,various thoughts about applicable conditions of voidable corporate decisions exist. For the triple-division,these conditions can be logically determined. The value of institution for voidable,non-existent and void corporate decisions differ from one another,so the applicable conditions of the three sorts must be strictly defined. The difficulty of this problem is to determine correctly the validity of defective procedural decisions. Procedural defect which apply to voidable corporate decisions must be defined to those severe enough but still inadequate to result in non-existent ones. Based on this frame,the concrete procedural conditions that voidable corporate decisions are applied can be thoroughly discussed.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第8期40-46,84,共8页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金项目"政府规制公司法律问题研究"(08CFX027)
关键词
公司决议瑕疵
公司决议可撤销
撤销事由
Defective Corporate Decisions,Voidable Corporate Decisions,Voidable Conditions,Value of Institution
