2Keel BA, Quinn P, Schmidt CF Jr, et al. Results of the American Association of Bioanalysts National Proficiency Testing Programme in andrology [J]. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(3): 680-686.
3Brazil C, Swan SH, Tollner CR, et al. Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study[J]. J Androl, 2004, 25(4): 645-656.
4Peters A J, Zaneveld LJ, Jeyendran RS. Quality assurance for sperm concentration using latex beads [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 1993, 60 ( 4 ):702-705.
5Ginsburg KA, Armant DR. The influence of chamber characteristics on the reliability of sperm concentration and movement measurements obtained by manual and videomicrographic analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 1990, 53(5): 882-887.
6Fisch H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, et al. Semen analyses in 1283men from the United States over a 25-year period: no decline in quality [ J]. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65 (5): 1009-1014.
8Fisch H, Goluboff ET. Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65(5): 1044-1046.
9Franken DR. African experience with sperm morphology training courses [ J ]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003, 7 ( 1 ): 114-119.
10Cooper TG, Bjorndahl L, Vreeburg J, et al. Semen analysis and external quality control schemes for semen analysis need global standardization [ J ]. Int J Androl, 2002, 25 (5): 306-311.
10National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples.Approved guideline[S].EP9-A,Pennsylvania:NCCLS,1986.
