摘要
模糊语言、挑选和类比等修辞策略的运用使邓玉娇案在社会讨论中形成了不同的版本。每一个版本的叙述均没有偏离"邓玉娇刺死邓贵大、刺伤黄德智"这一核心事实,但是却导向截然不同的结论。作为案件事实形成的潜在推动因素,修辞所扮演的角色不是简单的语言装饰,而是参与案件事实的建构。案件事实的演变及其最终形成,正是在修辞的运作中维系下去的。但是,修辞也左右着我们对案件事实的认知,其中隐含的陷阱值得警惕。
Rhetorical strategies such as Vague language, selection and analog used in Deng Yu Jiao Case make it form different versions. Each version is not deviated from the core fact, but a very different conclusion-oriented. As the potential factors to promote the formation of ease, the role of rhetoric is not a simple language of deooration, but to participate in the construction of the facts of the case. However, the rhetoric also affects our perception of the facts, which should be vigilant.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2009年第5期31-38,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
案件事实
修辞策略
建构
陷阱
the fact of case
Rhetorical strategies
Construction
hidden traps
