摘要
目的改进子宫腔吸引管的清洗方法,并与传统清洗方法比较,旨在寻求最佳的清洁方式,提高清洗质量。方法按清洗方法和操作程序分别设置A、B两组:A组为改进后的清洗方法,多酶浸泡+专业刷刷洗管腔+高压水枪冲洗+超声波多酶清洗(刷洗组);B组为传统清洗方法,不刷洗管腔,其余清洗程序与A组相同(未刷洗组);用目测和细菌检测方法比较其清洗质量。结果清洗后洁净度合格率A组为99.52%,B组为56.25%(P<0.001),管腔内壁带菌率A组0.42%,B组60.42%(P<0.001),均差异有统计学意义,优化后的清洗方法(刷洗组)清洗效果明显优于传统清洗方法(未刷洗组)。结论正确有效的多重去污清洗方法与合适、必要的清洁工具,是保证子宫腔吸引管清洁质量的关键。
OBJECTIVE To optimize the cleaning method of uterine cavity aspiration tube, compare with traditional method, in order to search the best way to improve the cleaning quality. METHODS Two groups A and B were set up according to the cleaning method and procedure. Group A （scrubbing group） was washed by optimized method, namely multi-enzyme soaking, scrubbing the lumen with special brush, rinsing with high pressure spray gun, and ultrasonic multi-enzyme cleaning. Group B （no scrubbing group） was used by traditional cleaning method~ the cleaning procedure of Group B was almost the same with group A but had no lumen scrubbing. Both eyeballing and bacterial detection methods were used to compare cleaning quality of the two groups. RESULTS After cleaning procedure, the cleanliness pass rate of groups A and B was 99.52% and 56.25%, respectively （P〈0. 001）, the lumen infection rate of groups A was and B was 0. 42%, and B 60. 42%, respectively. The cleaning effect of optimized cleaning method （scrubbing group） was significantly better than traditional cleaning method （no scrubbing group）. CONCLUSIONS The correct and effective multiple-decontamination cleaning method, and appropriate and necessary cleaning tools, are the keys to ensure the cleaning quality of uterine cavity aspiration tube.
出处
《中华医院感染学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第18期2449-2451,共3页
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词
子宫腔吸引管
清洗方法
效果分析
Uterine cavity aspiration tube
Cleaning method
Effect analysis
