摘要
自上世纪80年代以来,"权利话语"逐渐成为我国法学界的主流话语。"权利本位"也在中国法学界的激烈讨论中获得了正统学说的地位。有论者基于经济学思维与理念对"权利话语"、"权利本位"进行批判甚至解构。这种经济学进路的背后,是一种建立在自然科学研究意义上的"经济学帝国主义"思维。在它看似无立场的研究角度的背后,却是一种追求效率至上的价值取向。这与法学所应追求的正义底线价值是格格不入的。它可能导致一种专制主义思维。尽管"权利本位"作为法律的普适价值存有争论,但是没有它却是极其危险的。
The ＂discourse of rights＂ has become the mainstream in the jurisprudence circle of our country since 1980s. Accordingly, the ＂standard of rights＂ has obtained the orthodox status through fierce argumentation. Based on thinking patterns and ideas of economics, some scholars attempted to criticize or even deconstruct ＂discourse of rights＂ and ＂standard of rights＂. Such economics path is established on the imperialism of economics in compliance with natural science. In fact, it is an efficiency orientated value judgment hidden from the seemingly non -positional research approach, which is contradictory to the bottom line of justice pursued by jurisprudence. Unfortunately, it would lead to absolutism. There is still controversy that whether the ＂standard of rights＂ has the general values, but lack of which would definitely be perilous.
出处
《北方法学》
2009年第5期155-160,共6页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
权利话语
权利本位
经济学帝国主义
专制主义
discourse of rights
standard of rights
imperialism of economics
absolutism
