期刊文献+

无人系统自主等级模糊评价方法 被引量:12

Fuzzy Evaluated Method for the Autonomy Levels of Unmanned Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了评价无人系统在处理任务时的自主等级,本文构造了一个自主等级评定模型.它首先对系统执行行为序列后产生的反馈值进行分析,建立了一套评价自主等级的指标体系,包括环境的变化量、任务的完成度、系统状态的稳定度以及操作者和系统的交互程度.然后,将模糊集合论的思想和方法引入其中,提出模糊决策的方法来计算出无人系统的自主等级.最后,给出一个实例并进行验证. In order to evaluate the autonomy levels of unmanned systems dealing with the mission, a model of evaluating the autonomy levels is constructed. Firstly, a set of performance index system to evaluate the autonomy levels is set up which include variation of en- vironment, the stability of the system states and the degree of interaction between the system and operators based on the analysis of the feedback values produced by system after executing a series of behaviors. Then, fuzzy set theory is introduced to the autonomy levels for unmanned systems. Finally,the method above is verified by an example.
作者 杨哲 张汝波
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期2043-2047,共5页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
关键词 无人系统 自主等级 指标体系 模糊评价方法 unmanned systems autonomy levels index system fuzzy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Connelly J, Hong W S, Mahoney R B. Challenges in autonomous system development [ J ]. Proceedings of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2006 : 220- 224.
  • 2Hui-Min Huanga, James Albusa, Elena Mcssinaa, et al. Specifying autonomy levels for unmanned systems: interim report [ C ]. Proceedings of SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, Bellingham, WA ,2004:386-397.
  • 3Thomas B Sheridan. Telerobotics, Automation, and human supervisory control[M]. The MIT Press,1992.
  • 4Raja Parasuraman, Thomas B Sheridan, Christopher D Wickens. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans,2000,30 ( 3 ) :286-297.
  • 5Ryan W Proud, Jeremy J Hart, Richard B Mrozinski. Methods for determining the level of autonomy to design into a human spaceflight vehicle: a function specific approach [ C ]. Proceedings of NIST Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, Gaithersburg, MD, September,2003.
  • 6Clough B T. Metrics, schmetrics ! How the beck do you determine a UAV's autonomy anyway [ C]. Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 2002.
  • 7Huang Hui-Min, Elena Messina, James Albus. Toward a generic model for autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) [ C ]. Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2003.
  • 8Huang Hui-Min, Kerry Pavek, James Albus, et al. Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) framework: an update[C]. Proceedings of SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 2005.
  • 9Mu Jin-bo. Application of analytical hierarchy process method for selecting zhe optimal environmental engineering cheme [ J ]. Advances In Environmental Science, 1997,5 (4) : 33-40.

同被引文献133

引证文献12

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部