摘要
从侦查目的和犯罪嫌疑人诉讼命运的认知角度,在法国、英国和我国,侦查到案都是刑事程序的关键性阶段。对于如此关键的诉讼阶段,法、英警察拘留的制度和实践主要有三方面的经验。与法、英两国的经验对照,我国侦查到案制度存在的主要问题包括:其一,在到案措施适用环节,侦查权力所受的规范限制过严,而实践中又过于随意。其二,在到案羁留环节,不仅侦查权与犯罪嫌疑人的权利严重不均衡,必要的权力监督机制也基本阙如。其三,在案件处理环节,中间程序的设置不利于理性侦查,继续侦查的羁押化处理不利于犯罪嫌疑人权利保障,整体上则降低了侦查程序的效率。基于此,我国侦查到案制度的未来改革应当遵循动态均衡的价值准则,技术路径上,既应关注到案阶段整体构造的合理性,也应重视局部环节的完善。
Investigative to - case is the key phase of criminal procedure in France, Britain and China from the point of view of investigative purpose and suspects＇ litigation fortune. The police detention system and practice of France and Britain have three main aspects of experiences to deal with the key phase. Compared to the experiences of France and Britain, the main problems of China＇s investigative to - case system include ： First, in the rathe of investigative to - case measures application, investigative power is too normatively restricted but too arbitrary in practice. Second, in the tache of to - case detention, there are not only serious imbalances between investigative power and suspects＇ rights, but also no necessary power supervision mechanism. Third, in the tache of case disposal, middle procedure is not in favor of rational investigation and detention disposal for continual investigation is not in favor of suspects＇ rights protection. It decreases the efficiency of investigative procedure on the whole. Based on it, the future reform on China＇s investigative to -case system should follow the value of dynamic equilibrium. On technology path, the reasonableness of whole structure of to -case phases and improvement of local taches should be both paid attention to.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期137-149,共13页
China Legal Science
基金
四川大学2008年度校级哲学社会科学研究一般项目资助
