期刊文献+

C反应蛋白在恶性血液病感染中的临床研究 被引量:11

CRP in Diagnosis of Infection among Patients with Malignant Hematological Disease:Clinical Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨C反应蛋白(CRP)和体温对于恶性血液病患者感染及感染严重程度的临床诊断价值。方法对上海市第一人民医院血液科2004年5月-2005年5月收治入选的已行CRP检查的119例恶性病患者按照病原学和抗菌药物应用情况分为感染组和非感染组进行CRP浓度及体温的比较。结果感染组与非感染组CRP浓度及体位差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05);CRP曲线下面积(AUC)为0.924,体温AUC为0.864,CRP浓度对于感染的鉴别值为54.5 mg/L,其敏感性分别为87.8%,特异性分别为75.2%,体温对于感染的鉴别值为38.3℃;其敏感性分别为83.7%,特异性分别为73.2%;CRP联合体温对于感染鉴别的敏感性和特异性分别为92.3%、75.6%。结论CRP和体温可以做为血液恶性病患者感染的良好辅助诊断指标,尤其是CRP联合体温,敏感性高。 OBJECTIVE To analyze and compare the value of c-reactive protein(CRP) and body temperature in the infection diagnosis and severity of infection among the patients with malignant hematological disease. METHODS According to the microorganism detection and application of antibiotics, we divided the 119 patients into infection group and noninfection group from May 2004 to May 2005 in our ward. CRP and temperature of the patients were measured and. RESULTS There were 88 cases in the infection group and 31 cases in the noninfection group. The CRP plasma concentration had significant difference between too groups (P〈0.01). Also the body temperature was significantly different between them (P〈0.05). The area under curve(AUC) of CRP was 0. 924 and its cutoff value was 54.5 mg/L. Its sensitivity and specificity were 87.8% and 75.2%, respectively. The AUC of the body temperature was 0. 863 and its cutoff value was 38. 3 ℃. Its sensitivity and specificity were 83. 7% and 73.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of combination of CRP and body temperature were 92.3% and 75.6%. CONCLUSIONS CRP and body temperature are helpful indicators of infection in the patients with malignant hematological disease. The combination of the two indicators has higher sensitivity.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第20期2697-2700,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 C反应蛋白 感染 恶性血液病 CRP Infection Malignant hematological disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Povoa P. C-reactive protein: a valuable marker of sepsis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2002,28 (3) : 235-243.
  • 2Kallio R,Bloigu A, Surcel HM,et al. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in differential diagnosis between infection and neoplastic fever in patients with solid tumours and lymphomas[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2001,9 (2) :124-128.
  • 3Pepys MB,Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update[J]. J Clin Invest,2003,111(12) : 1805-1812.
  • 4Harbarth S, Holeckova K, Froidevaux C, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 in critically ill patients admitted with suspected sepsis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001,164(3), 396-402.
  • 5Suprin E, Camus C, Gacouin A, et al. Procalcitonin: a valuable indicator of infection in a medical ICU[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2000,26 (9) : 1232-1238.
  • 6Brunkhorst FM,Wegsheider K, Forycki ZF,et al. Procalcitonin for early diagnosis and differentiation of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Med,2000,26(5):S148-S152.
  • 7Selberg O, Hecker H, Martin M,et al. Discrimination of sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome by determination of circulating plasma concentrations of procalcitonin, protein complement 3a, and interleukin-6[J]. Crit Care Medl 2000,28(8): 2793-2798.
  • 8Luzzani A,Polati E, Dorizzi R, et al. Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of sepsis[J]. Crit Care Med,2003,31(6):1737-1741.
  • 9Penel N, Fournier C, Clisant S, et al. Causes of fever and value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in differentiating infections from paraneoplastic fever [J]. Support Care Cancer, 2004,12(8) :593-598.
  • 10Mitaka C. Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome [J]. Clin Chim Acta,2005,351(1-2) :17-29.

同被引文献82

引证文献11

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部