摘要
司法统一是司法正义最基本的诉求。2005年最高人民法院发布的《人民法院第二个五年改革纲要(2004-2008)》提出建立和完善我国的案例指导制度,以统一法律适用标准。但从我国案例指导的实践进程来看,其对统一法律适用标准的作用极为有限。鉴于我国制定法与大陆法系各国制定法的差距以及我国审级制度在统一法律适用上的欠缺,我国在设计案例指导制度时应当跳出大陆法系国家的定式,建立有限判例制度,并作为司法解释的一种形式,以弥补现行抽象性司法解释在统一法律适用上之不足。
Unified administration of justice is the most fundamental requirement for judicial justice. The Outline of the Second Five-year Reform of People＇s Court {2004-2008}, promulgated by the Supreme People＇s Court, proposes establishing and perfecting a case guiding system in China so as to unify the standards of legal application. However, the practice of case-guiding in China shows that its role in unifying the standards of legal application is very limited. In view of the disparity in statute laws between China and countries adopting the continental legal system, and the defectiveness of China＇ s trial grade system in the unification of the standards of legal application, China should break away from the established mode of the continental legal system in devising its own case guiding system and set up a limited precedent system which can be used as a form of judicial interpretation in order to make up for the deficiency of the current abstractive judicial interpretations in unifying legal applications.
出处
《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期22-29,共8页
Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金
司法部课题项目"司法能动性与司法解释的规制"(05SFB2029)
关键词
判例
案例指导
司法解释
legal precedent, case guiding, judicial interpretation
