摘要
我国刑事责任是犯罪的后果,具有静态性,无法反映可谴责性成立的过程,这是由二元分立的本质主义思维方式决定的。大陆法系刑事中,责任的概念与犯罪是同一的,责任以犯罪成立的方式存在,责任的罪责要素贯穿于犯罪成立的三个条件中,责任塑造了犯罪构成,因此责任反映出可谴责性成立的过程,其过程性、动态性特征尤为明显。这是由西方整体主义思维方式决定的。在犯罪论体系重构以及中国义务本位发生转变的情况下,刑事责任研究的思维进路必须被改变,使得对其研究进入真正的问题域,从而改变刑事责任在刑法中地位弱势和内容空洞的状况,祛除没有学术价值的无谓争议。
In China, the static criminal responsibility is the consequences of the crime, and it cannot reflect the process of the denounce. It is decided by the thought of the essentialism. In the civil law countries, the concept of criminal responsibility and crime is same. The existing way of the criminal responsibility is through the way that existence of crime. The elements of the criminal responsibility penetrates the process of the crime constitution, and it shapes the crime constitution, therefore, the criminal responsibility reflects the process of the crime constitution, and it is processing and dynamic which is determined by the thought of the holism. The criminal responsibility should be amended within the background of the current China to get the real question and alter the disadvantaged status and the empty content and eliminate the unnecessary disputes.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期100-104,共5页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
江苏省高校人文社会科学研究项目<和谐司法下的刑事责任研究>(编号:08SJB8200013)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
刑事责任
思维模式
结果性地位
过程性地位
criminal responsibility
mode of thinking
status of result
status of process
