TRIPS协定下中国知识产权保护水平和实际保护强度被引量：56

Nominal Level and Actual Strength of China's Intellectual Property Protection (IPP) Under the TRIPS Agreement

导出

摘要基于GP和HL方法,我们提出改进方法探究了1995-2007年中国知识产权名义保护水平和实际保护强度。研究发现:(1)GP方法测算的1995-2007年中国知识产权保护水平显著地提高,体现出TRIPS协定约束下中国不断完善立法,已达到较高的名义保护水平。(2)HL方法修正后的保护水平明显地低于GP方法下保护水平,揭示出中国社会法制化程度和法律体系完备程度发展相对滞后。(3)经济发展水平、法治水平和知识产权执法水平是影响中国知识产权实际保护强度的重要因素。据此,本文改进方法测算的中国知识产权实际保护强度呈阶段式提高。相比来看,GP方法测算的中国知识产权保护水平偏高,而HL方法修正后的保护水平偏低;中国知识产权名义保护水平很大程度上是受立法程度的影响,而实际保护强度主要体现了执法力度的成效。本文建议通过法治教育与培训来改善中国知识产权保护的社会意识,增强民间行业协会自律约束机制,细化各执法机构的执行职能,加强司法审查,以期强化知识产权执法力度。 Based on GP's and HL's approaches,we propose the modified approach to measure nominal level and actual protection strength (APS) of China's intellectual property from 1995 to 2007.The findings are that:(1) nominal level of China's IPP measured by GP approach had heightened notably from 1995 to 2007.It shows that China has continually improved IPP legislation under the TRIPS constraint,and has achieved high nominal level.(2) China's IPP level by HL approach is evidently lower than that of GP approach.It reveals that China's rule of law level and law system maturity is developed rather laggardly.(3) Economic development level,rule of law level,and implementing law level are important factors of affecting the actual protection strength of China's intellectual property.Our modified approach proves that China's APS appears an increase with a phase.By comparison,China's IPP level by GP approach is on the high side,whereas China's IPP level by HL approach is on the low side.Nominal level of China's IPP is largely influenced by the legislation level,whereas China's APS mostly embodies the effect of implementing law level.Our proposals are that China improve social consciousness of China's IPP by education and training of rule of law,enhance the self-discipline mechanism of civil guild,specify the rights and responsibilities of different enforcement institutions,strengthen the judicial review,so that strengthens the implementing law level of China's intellectual property.

作者沈国兵刘佳

机构地区复旦大学经济学院复旦大学世界经济研究所

出处《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期66-71,60,共7页 Finance & Trade Economics

基金国家社会科学基金项目(批准号:07BJY012) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金项目(批准号:08JJD790138)资助复旦大学中国经济国际竞争力研究创新基地国际环境研究项目资助

关键词 TRIPS协定知识产权保护实际保护强度 TRIPS Agreement,Intellectual Property Protection,Actual Protection Strength

分类号 F204 [经济管理—国民经济] F752 [经济管理—国际贸易] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1韩玉雄,李怀祖.关于中国知识产权保护水平的定量分析[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):377-382. 被引量：377
2Bender, T. , How to Cope with China's (Alleged) Failure to Implement the TRIPS Obligations on Enforcement. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 2006, pp. 230--250.
3Fink, C. and K. Maskus, Why We Study Intellectual Property Rights and What We Have Learned. In Fink and Maskus (eds.), Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 17--31.
4Gervais, D., Intellectual Property, Trade and Development : Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPS- plus Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 1--59.
5Ginarte, J. and W. Park , Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy. Vol. 26, Issue 3, 1997, pp. 283--301.
6Kaufmann, D. , A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi, Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996--2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4654, 2008, pp. 1--102.
7Maskus, K. , S. Dougherty and A. Mertha, Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development in China. In Fink and Maskus (eds.), Intellectual Property and DeveLopment : Lessons from Recent Economic Research. Oxford.. Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 295--331.
8Ostergard, R. , The Development Dilemma: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights in the International System. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2003, pp. 1--163.
9Rapp, R. and R. Rozek, Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries. Journal of World Trade, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1990, pp. 75--102.
10Wang, L. , Intellectual Property Protection in China. The International Information & Library Review, Vol. 36, Issue 3, 2004, pp. 253--261.

二级参考文献13

1曲三强.被动立法的百年轮迴——谈中国知识产权保护的发展历程[J].中外法学,1999,11(2):119-122. 被引量：65
2Smarzynska B. The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies [J]. European Economic Review, 2004, 48: 39 62.
3Blakeney M. Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide to the TRIPs Agreement [M]. London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 1996.
4WIPO. WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use [M]. Geneva: WIPO Publication, 2001.
5Barro R J, X Sala i Martin. Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, (2): 1-27.
6Helpman E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights [J]. Econometrica, 1993, 61: 1247-1280.
7Lai E L C. International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1998, 55: 133-153.
8Glass A J, Saggi K. Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2002, 56: 387-410.
9Rapp R T, Rozek R P. Benefits and costs of intellectual property protection in developing countries [J]. Journal of World Trade, 1990, 24: 75-102.
10Oxley J E. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter firm alliances [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1999, 38: 283-309.