期刊文献+

卒中单元超早期康复治疗对急性脑出血患者的疗效观察及治疗费用评价 被引量:1

Therapeutic efficacy and health economic evaluation of early rehabilitation intervention in stroke unit applied to patients with cerebral hemorrhage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察卒中单元超早期康复治疗对急性脑出血患者的治疗效果,并对治疗费用进行评价。方法选择符合入选条件的急性脑出血患者131例,进入卒中单元病房62例,普通病房69例,卒中单元病房组患者进行超早期康复训练,普通病房组无康复训练计划,且无专业治疗小组对患者进行治疗,依患者意愿进行康复。治疗前后评价两组神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)和日常生活能力(ADL)Barthel指数,并比较住院期间的感染率、病死率、住院费用及住院时间。结果卒中单元病房组患者治疗前NIHSS评分为(11.0±8.4)分,普通病房组患者治疗前NIHSS评分为(10.9±7.6)分,差异无统计学意义(t=0.114,P〉0.05),出院时两组NIHSS评分分别为(4.3±3.5)分、(7.9±5.0)分,与普通病房组患者比较,卒中单元病房组患者NIHSS评分明显改善(t=-3.211,P〈0.05)。卒中单元病房组和普通病房组治疗前ADL Barthel指数评分分别为(49.4±25.8)分和(51.7±34.3)分,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.443,P〉0.05),出院时两组分别为(85.9±29.6)分和(67.1±37.1)分,与普通病房组患者比较,卒中单元病房组患者ADL Barthel指数评分明显改善(t=3.194,P〈0.05)。与普通病房组比较,卒中单元病房组住院期间的肺部感染率(8.06%与15.94%,χ^2=3.901,P〈0.05)、尿路感染率(6.45%与11.59%,χ^2=4.138,P〈0.05)、病死率(4.84%与7.25%,χ^2=4.351,P〈0.05)降低、人均住院费用[(17506.9±954.1)元与(21096.5±923.5)元,t=-20.786,P〈0.01]减少及平均住院时间[(20.5±7.0)d与(31.4±8.1)d,t=-8.196,P〈0.01]缩短。结论卒中单元模式下超早期康复治疗有利于脑出血患者的恢复。 Objective To observe the therapeutic efficacy and evaluate the health economics of early rehabilitation intervention applied to patients with cerebral hemorrhage in stroke unit. Methods A total of 131 cerebral hemorrhage patients were randomly assigned to the stroke unit group (n= 62) and the control group (n=69). The patients in the stroke unit group received rehabilitation training at a very early stage, while there were no rehabilitation training program and no professional treatment team for patients in the control group. Results of the national institute health stroke scale (NIHSS), activities of daily living (ADL) Barthel index were compared between the two groups. Infection rate, mortality, cost of hospitalization and length of stay were also compared. Results There were better therapeutic effects as revealed by NIHSS (4.3+3.5 vs. 7.9+5.0, t=-3.211, P〈0. 05), ADL Barthel index score (85.9+429.6 vs. 67.1 +37.1, t= 3. 194, P〈0. 05), lower incidence of infection in lung (8.06% vs. 15.94%, χ^2 = 3. 901, P 〈0.05) and in urinary tract (6.45% vs. 11.59%,χ^2=4.138, P〈0.05), lower mortality (4.84% vs. 7.25%, χ^2=4.351, P〈 0.05), lower cost of hospitalization [¥(17506.90±954.10) vs. ¥(21096.49±923.46), t=-20. 786, P〈0.01)] and shorter length of stay((20. 47±7. 03)d vs. (31.42±8.14)d, t=-8.196, P〈 0.01)] in the stroke unit group compared to the control group. Conclusions Earlyrehabilitation intervention by stroke unit is advantageous to patients with cerebral hemorrhage.
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期908-911,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金 浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金(B类)(2005B175)
关键词 脑出血 康复 卫生经费支出 疾病管理 Cerebral hemorrhage Rehabilitation Health expenditures Disease management
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献16

  • 1陈东成,龙信聪,肖广新,张柏明.YL-1型穿刺针用于高血压脑出血治疗的临床研究[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2005,8(1):27-28. 被引量:3
  • 2<脑卒中综合规范临床(内科)诊治研究方案>协作组.规范治疗急性脑卒中显著降低患者住院病死率[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(1):17-21. 被引量:74
  • 3李绍英,刘萍.卒中单元:离临床还有多远?[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25(5):473-475. 被引量:8
  • 4各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33029
  • 5Treib J,Grauer MT,Woessner R, et al. Treatment of stroke on an intensive stroke unit : a novel concept. Intensive Care Med, 2000, 26 : 1598-1611.
  • 6Langhorne P, Pollock A. In conjunction with the Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration. What are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing,2002,31:365-371.
  • 7Nikolaus T, Jamour M. Effectiveness of special stroke units in treatment of acute stroke. Z Gerontol Gerlatr,2000,33:96-101.
  • 8Counsell C,Boonyakarnkul S,Dennis M et al.Primary intracerebral heamorrhage in the Oxfordshine Community stroke project.Prognosis Cerebrovasc Dis,1995,5(1):26.
  • 9Evans A,Harraf F,Donaldson N et al.Randomized Controlled Study of stroke unit care Versus stroke team care indifferent stroke subtypes.Stroke,2002,33(2):449.
  • 10Indredavik B,Bakke F,Slordahl A et al.Stoke unit treatment:10-year follow-up.Stroke,1999,30(8):1524.

共引文献146

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部