期刊文献+

风险社会之刑法应对 被引量:177

Coping with Risk Society: Criminal Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 风险社会为理解和把握现代刑法提供了全新的观察视角,也为反思传统刑法提供了重要的理论工具。为了应对风险,有必要制定风险刑法。风险刑法在观念、功能和归责等方面与传统刑法有显著不同,对传统刑法基本原则构成挑战,并对传统刑法价值体系进行裂解,隐含有巨大风险。在风险社会,可以采用传统刑法与风险刑法并存的方式,以弥补传统刑法在功能上的不足和责任追究上的漏洞,两者互相支持,共同达成维护社会秩序和安全的目标。 Risk criminal law results from the coming of risk society. The risk society not only offers a new visual angle for understanding and mastering modern criminal law, but also provides an important theoretical tool for re-thinking traditional criminal law. Risk criminal law tries to establish a new model of criminal law to prevent and solve risks beyond traditional criminal law. The normalization and functionalism of criminal law become the theoretical basis of risk criminal law. The former emphasizes to model people's activities through norms in order to keep people loyal to laws and norms. The latter emphasizes that criminal law plays a more active role in preventing risks in order to maintain the safety and order of society. Risk criminal law is substan- tially different from traditional criminal law. It establishes a new paradigm of criminal law, adjusts its functions, changes the principle of liability imputation, re-constructs the constitutions of risk crimes and prepositionally uses punishments. Risk criminal law transforms the value systems of traditional criminal law, thus brings about some risks and dangers. Firstly, it launches challenge to the basic principles of traditional crimi-nal law. It has conflicts with the principle of legality, the principle of criminal responsibility and the principle of proportionality. Secondly, it splits the system of values of traditional criminal law. Its boundary of punishment is quite indefinite because it takes the necessity of preventing risks rather than the infringement of legal interests as the basis of punishment. Thirdly, it changes the principle of liability imputation, so it may excessively expand the scope of criminal responsibility. In short, equality, freedom and rights advocated and pursued by traditional criminal law are still regarded as the basic values. Therefore, risk criminal law can not completely replace traditional criminal law, and it should be a supplement to make up for the weaknesses and loopholes of traditional criminal law. In other words, traditional criminal law and risk criminal law should coexist. They support each other to realize the goals of maintaining the order and safety of society.
作者 陈晓明
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期52-64,共13页 Chinese Journal of Law
关键词 风险 风险社会 风险刑法 传统刑法 risk, risk society, risk criminal law, traditional criminal law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1李汉林,渠敬东,夏传玲,陈华珊.组织和制度变迁的社会过程——一种拟议的综合分析[J].中国社会科学,2005(1):94-108. 被引量:159
  • 2柯武刚.《制度经济学》[M].商务印书馆,2000..
  • 3波斯纳 苏力译.《法理学问题》[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001年.第380页以下.
  • 4波斯纳 苏力译.《法理学问题》[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002..
  • 5卡多佐 本杰明 苏力译.《司法过程的性质》[M].商务印书馆,1998年..
  • 6庞德 沈宗灵.《通过法律的社会控制》[M].商务印书馆,1984年版.第55页.
  • 7卡多佐 苏力译.《司法过程的性质》[M].商务印书馆,2000年版.第13-14页.
  • 8贝克.《世界风险社会》,南京大学出版社,2004年版,第137页,第4页,第169页,第7页,第107页,第103页,第3页,第50页,第22页.
  • 9考夫曼.《法律哲学》.刘幸义等译.法律出版社2004年版,页106—116,页109,页149,页180-181,页118,页120,页189.
  • 10史密斯、霍根:《英国刑法》,李贵方等译,法律出版社2000年版,页13

同被引文献1889

二级引证文献1796

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部