期刊文献+

当代西方社会学理论整合困境的透析--兼谈社会互构论的理论意义 被引量:5

An Analysis on Dilemma of Theoretical Integration in Contemporary Western Sociology——Discussing on Theoretical Meaning of Social Interconstructionism
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代西方社会学的理论整合再现其一贯的困境。自古典时期以来,自由主义的意识形态深刻地决定了西方社会学理论的基调与走向,具有绝对意义的自由信条不仅为理论的发展自我设限,从而导致抽象的二元对立以及形而上学的自我循环,并且化为一种抽象空洞的逻辑起点,导致理论的匮乏与无力。当代的"消解"逆动客观上又再现同样的逻辑及刷新固有的对立。真正的超越之途,从根本上说,就是回到事情本身,即回到现实的个人与社会关系本身。对于陷入困境的西方社会学理论传统而言,回到事情本身,首要的就是卸下虚假的意识形态价值预设与信条,使丰富立体的"个人与社会"及其生动的关系过程真正映入其原本蒙蔽了的视野,以破解二元困境。这也正是"社会互构论"的一个重要方面。 Dilemma appears again in theoretical integration in contemporary western sociology. To rethink and conclude the crux and sources of the dilemma, this article will give an analysis from three aspects, which are misunderstanding negation, abstract duality and empty start-point. Generally speaking, ideology of freedomism has decided the basis and trend of western sociology from the classical period, in which, absolute belief on freedom not only restricts the development of theory, leading to self-circle between abstract binary opposition and metaphysics, but also becomes an abstract and empty start-point, continually leading to lack of impetus in theory creation. The same logic and inherent opposition reappear in contemporary negation movement. The correct way of transcendence is to come back to itself of things, that is, to come back to itself of realistic relationship between individual and society. As to western sociological tradition that falls in dilemma, coming back to itself of things means that they should abandon the false ideological value presupposition and belief first. Also, they should make the abundant and lively process of individual-society relationship really show their befuddled perspectives. Then the dilemma of dualism can be solved, which is one of important aims for social interconstructionism.
作者 郑杭生 费菲
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期70-79,共10页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 理论整合 二元对立 行动 结构 建构论 行动论范式 theoretical integration binary opposition action structure constructionism action paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1安东尼·吉登斯.《社会的构成》.李康,李猛译.北京:三联书店,1998年.第351页.
  • 2《马克思恩格斯选集》,2版,第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1995.
  • 3马尔科姆·沃特斯.《现代社会学理论》.北京:华夏出版社,2000年.
  • 4皮埃尔·布迪厄,华康德.《实践与反思-反思社会学导引》,北京:中央编译出版社,1998年,第133页.
  • 5T.帕森斯.《社会行动的结构》,第199-243页.南京,译林出版社,2003.
  • 6马尔科姆·沃特斯.《现代社会学理论》[M].华夏出版社,2000年4月第1版..
  • 7《马克思恿格斯选集》,2版,第1卷,71-72,73页,北京,人民出版社,1995.
  • 8美国著名教育社会家马丁·特罗逝世.社会学视野网.2007-03-24.

共引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部