期刊文献+

香蕉风灾保险的最优财政补贴规模测度——来自海南省681户蕉农的经验证据 被引量:9

Estimation of Optimal Size of Financial Subsidies to Banana Windstorm Insurance——Evidence from 681 Banana Planters in Hainan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探索条件价值评估最大支付意愿引导技术在中国香蕉风灾保险产品设计中的适用性,并为政策制定者调整和完善香蕉风灾保险财政补贴制度提供决策依据。【方法】基于海南省681户蕉农的实地调查,采用CVM调查中最适宜的问卷形式——二分式问卷格式,运用单边界、双边界二分式条件价值评估方法,较精确地测度出香蕉风灾保险的最优财政补贴规模。【结果】费率单边界问卷格式和双边界问卷格式估计平均最大支付意愿分别为19.25%、17.54%,其两问卷格式估计平均最大支付意愿的95%置信区间分别为18.77%~19.79%,16.89%~17.72%;财政补贴单边界问卷格式和双边界问卷格式估计平均最大支付意愿分别为26.38%、39.25%,其两问卷格式估计平均最大支付意愿的95%置信区间分别为25.70%~27.07%,38.94%~39.57%。【结论】与单边界问卷格式相比,双边界问卷格式能够获得被调查者支付意愿的更多信息,从而缩小了估计的置信区间,提高了最大支付意愿的估计精度;在连续3年的试点实践中,海南香蕉风灾保险试点规模占其香蕉种植面积不足10%,结合本研究结果,笔者认为海南省财政应在2007、2008连续两年30%的财政补贴基础上进一步加大对香蕉风灾保险业的补贴力度,力争补贴比例达到40%左右,同时费率也不宜过低,宜保持在18%左右。据此提出了促进政策性农业保险可持续发展的两大建议:构建财政支持政策性农业保险的长效机制和构建具有"适度强制性"的政策性农业保险制度。 【Objective】 The applicability of technique applied in banana windstorm insurance of China to induce the greatest willingness to pay of contingent valuation was explored,and the decision basis was provided for policy makers to adjust and perfect the financial subsidy system of banana windstorm insurance.【Method】 Based on the field survey of 681 banana planters in Hainan province,the optimum questionnaire format of CVM,dichotomous choice format was adopted,using the single-bounded and double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation technique to estimate the optimal size of financial subsidies to banana windstorm insurance accurately.【Result】 The results show that the mean greatest willingness to pay of premium rate single-bounded and double-bounded estimation were 19.25% and 17.54%,respectively.The 95% confidence interval of greatest willingness to pay estimated by these two questionnaire formats were 18.77%-19.79% and 16.89%-17.72%,respectively.【Conclusion】 Compared with the single-bounded questionnaire format,the double-bounded questionnaire format could obtain more information about the respondents′ willingness to pay,hence,it reduces the confidence interval range and improves the estimation accuracy of the greatest willingness to pay.At the pilot practice for three continuous years,the percent of banana windstorm insurance pilot size in the total banana planting area was less than 10% in Hainan.Combined with this research result,the author holds that Hainan finance should strength the subsidy to banana windstorm insurance on the basis of 30% subsidy in two continuous years of 2007 and 2008,and the subsidy percentage should try to achieve 40%.At the same time,the premium rate should not be too low,18% is suitable.According to this,the author puts forward two recommendations of promoting the sustainable development of agricultural insurance:To build a long-term mechanism of financial support for policy-oriented agricultural insurance and build a moderate mandatory policy-oriented agricultural insurance system.
作者 潘勇辉
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期4372-4382,共11页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家社科基金项目"农业补贴的国际比较研究"(08BJY135)
关键词 条件价值评估 二分式问卷格式 财政补贴 香蕉风灾保险 CVM dichotomous choice format financial subsidies banana windstorm insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Just R E, Calvin L, Quggin J. Adverse selection in crop insurance: actuarial and asymmetric information incentives. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 1999, 81(4): 838-849.
  • 2Goodwin B K. Problems with market insurance in agriculture. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 2001, 83(3): 643-649.
  • 3Orden D. Should there be a federal income safety net?l/The Agricultural Outlook Forum 2001, Washington, DC, 2001.
  • 4Glauber J W. Double indemnity: crop insurance and the failure of U. S. Agricultural Disaster Policy//American Enterprise Institute Project, Agricultural Policy for the 2007 Farm Bill and Beyond, 2007.
  • 5Young C E, Vandeveer M L, Schnepf R D. Production and price impacts of crop insurance programs. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 2001, 83(5): 1196-1203.
  • 6Just R E, Calvin L. Moral hazard in U. S. crop insurance: an empirical-investigation., http: //www. arec. umd. edu/LibComp/ AREClib/Publications/Working-Papers-PDF-files/93-14. pdf.
  • 7Glauber J W. Corp insurance reconsidered. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 2004, 86(5): 1179-1195.
  • 8王东阳.农业风险辨识、风险评价与风险管理研究//农业经济与科技发展研究.北京:中国农业出版社,2007.
  • 9黄季煜.增加收入、市场化:美国农业补贴政策的历史演变.中国社会科学报,2009-8-13.
  • 10宁满秀,苗齐,邢鹂,钟甫宁.农户对农业保险支付意愿的实证分析——以新疆玛纳斯河流域为例[J].中国农村经济,2006(6):43-51. 被引量:102

二级参考文献61

共引文献276

同被引文献150

引证文献9

二级引证文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部