公司治理、控制权性质与审计定价被引量：52

Corporate Governance,the Nature of Control Rights and Audit Fee

导出

摘要借鉴Simunic的审计定价模型,构建关于审计定价影响因素的多元线性回归方程,并以沪深两市上市公司2007年数据为研究对象,对股权结构、公司治理与审计定价之间的关系进行实证检验。研究结果表明,总体而言,公司治理因素对中国上市公司审计定价的解释力有限,说明中国会计师事务所在决定审计收费时对被审计单位的公司治理因素考虑较少。具体而言,终极控制人为政府的上市公司审计费用较低,股权集中度、管理层持股比例与审计定价之间大体上呈U型关系,即股权适度集中和管理层适度持股最有利于降低审计定价,进一步的研究发现,管理层持股比例与审计定价的U型关系仅存在于非国有控股公司样本中。研究还发现,中国会计师事务所在确定审计费用时会结合公司控制权的性质考虑风险因素对审计定价的影响。 Based on Simunic audit pricing model, this paper constructs a multiple linear regression equation on the factors affecting auditing pricing, and then examines the relationships between the nature of control right, corporate governance and auditing pricing using the data of A share listed companies of 2007. In a word, our findings provide scant support for the influence of corporate governance factors on auditing pricing in Chinese stock market, that＇s to say, corporate governance conditions of auditees are taken little into account by Chinese audit firms when they make decisions about audit pricing. Specifically, state-controlled listed companies pay fewer audit fees. Generally, concentration of ownership, manager ownership and auditing pricing presents U-shaped relationship speaking, in other words, moderate concentration of ownership and holding the appropriate ownership helps reduce auditing pricing. Further research suggests that the impact of manager ownership on auditing pricing only applies to nonstate-controlled listed companies. Moreover, we find evidence to support that auditors consider the influence of risk factors on auditing pricing combined with the nature of corporate control when they make auditing pricing decisions.

作者郭梦岚李明辉

机构地区南京大学商学院

出处《管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期71-83,共13页 Journal of Management Science

基金国家社会科学基金(06BJY058)~~

关键词审计定价公司治理控制权审计风险 auditing pricing corporate governance control right auditing risk

分类号 F239 [经济管理—会计学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献54

1Simunic D A. The Pricing of Audit Services:Theory and Evidence [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1980,18(1) :161-190.
2Houston R W, Peters M F, Pratt J H. The Audit Risk Model, Business Risk and Audit-Planning Decisions [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1999,74 (3) :281 -298.
3Houston R W, Peters M F, Pratt J H. Non-litigation Risk and Pricing Audit Services [ J ] . Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2005,24(1) :37-53.
4Carcello J V, Hermanson D R, Neal T L, Riley J R RA. Board Characteristics and Audit Fees [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2002,19 ( 3 ) : 365 - 385.
5Cohen J, Hanno D. Auditors' Consideration of Corporate Governance and Management Control Philosophy in Preplanning and Planning Judgments [ J ]. Audi- ting : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 2000,19 (2) : 133-146.
6Griffin P A, Lont D H, Sun Y. Corporate Governance and Audit Fees : Evidence of Countervailing Relations [J]. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2008,4( 1 ): 18-49.
7Tsui J, Jaggi B, Gul F. CEO, Domination, Discretionary Aeeruals and Audit Fees[ J ]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 2001,16 (3) : 189- 207.
8Bedard J C, Johnstone K M. Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors' Planning and Pricing Decisions [J]. The Accounting Review, 2004,79 ( 2 ) : 277- 304.
9Abbott L J, Parker S, Peters G F, Raghunandan K. The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees [ J ]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory ,2003,22(2) :17-32.
10O'Sullivan N. Board Characteristics and Audit Pricing Post-Cadbury : A Research Note [ J ]. European Accounting Review, 1999,8 ( 2 ) : 253- 263.