摘要
南海争端的实质是南海周边国家争夺南海的资源及战略通道的控制权。西方国际关系三大理论对中国在南海争端中应采取何种理性行为有一定启迪。现实主义能直击南海争端的实质所在,但其固有的"冲突常态"思维只能使争端扩大化。新自由制度主义对于合作的认同,有助于南海争端的和平解决。而建构主义对观念的强调,有助于促成双方无争议合作的实现。
The essence of the South China Sea dispute is the competition for resources and strategic channel＇ s control among countries around the South China Sea. The three major western international relations theories have certain enlightenment on China＇ s rational actions in the South China Sea dispute. Realism could detect the essence of the dispute directly, hut the inherent ＂conflict normal＂ way of thinking can only magnify the conflict and doesn＇ t really solve the problem. The identity on the cooperation of the Neoliberal Institutionalism will be helpful to solve the South China Sea dispute peacefully. While the emphasis on the concept of the Constructivism will be helpful to realize the bilateral non -controversial cooperation.
出处
《阴山学刊》
2009年第6期106-111,共6页
Yinshan Academic Journal
关键词
南海争端
中国
东盟
South China Sea Dispute
China
Association of Southeast Asian Nations
