摘要
最高人民法院创制公共政策有司法解释、司法文件、典型案例和司法审查四种形式,司法解释的存在曾经有其重要的意义,但这种立法化的司法解释也产生了许多弊端。作为将全国法官组织起来重要手段的司法文件,存在着一些潜在的问题。虽然存在着理论解释上的障碍,但在实践中最高人民法院公布的典型案例却实际上在发挥作用。由于我国司法审查的范围被限定在狭窄的对行政机关行为合法性的审查之内,所以其作用非常有限。在进行完善的前提下,案例形式应该成为最高人民法院创制公共政策的较好选择。
The way of making public policy by the Court may find their expressions in the form of judicial interpretations, judicial documents, typical cases and judicial review. Judicial interpretations has its significance, however, such kind of legislative character also exist some problems; the judicial documents have potential defects; and the typical cases has its obstacles in theoretical construction, anyhow, they play their role in reality. The role of judicial review is limited due to its confinement in the narrower legality review of administrative agencies. As for the forms, therefore,stare decisis should be a better choice for the public--policy--making of the Superrne People＇s Court.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期40-53,共14页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
最高人民法院
公共政策创制
形式
the Supreme People＇s Court
public-- policy-- making
form
