期刊文献+

肠内营养在食管癌手术中胸导管结扎病例的应用 被引量:5

Value of enteral nutrition on thoracic duct ligation in esophageal cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解胸导管结扎后肠内营养治疗对胸腔引流情况的影响。方法将116例食管癌手术患者分成肠内营养组(A组)和非肠内营养组(B组)。两组均在手术同期行低位胸导管结扎。A组病例术中置空肠营养管,从术后第1天开始肠内营养至术后第7天。B组患者术后肠外营养。两组病例分别统计胸腔引流量及胸管置留天数。结果两组病例的胸腔引流量和引流天数的差异无统计学意义。A组病例平均引流量(1087±98)m l,引流天数:(4.53±1.19)d。B组病例平均引流量(1268±103)m l,引流天数:(4.34±1.37)d。结论食管癌手术中胸导管结扎后可以施行早期肠内营养,不会引起胸腔引流量的增加和置管时间延长。 Aim To explore the value of Understanding of thoracic duct ligation enteral nutrition after treatment of pleural drainage situation. Methods 116 esophageal cancer patients were divided into enteral nutrition group (A group) and non-enteral nutrition group( B group). Both groups were low in the surgery of thoracic duct ligation. A group of surgery patients will be placed jejunal feeding tube ,from the I st day after the beginning of enteral nutrition to postoperative day 7. Group B patients will be in parenteral nutrition after surgery. For two groups, thoracic tube drainage and the number of days to stay in chest were recorded respectively. Results There was no statistical difference in both groups. For group A the whole drainage was( 1087±98 ) ml, and the number of days was(4.53± 1.19) days. For group B the average drainage was ( 1268 ±103) ml and the number of days was (4.34 ±1.37 ) days. Conclusions Esophageal cancer surgery after thoracic duct ligation could be implemented in early enteral nutrition, which will not cause an increase in chest drainage and cathetenzation time.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2010年第1期64-65,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 胸导管 肠内营养 引流量 thoracic duct enteral nutrition drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

共引文献227

同被引文献51

  • 1杨宇扬,朱妹花,刘宇斌,冼志勇.食管癌手术胸导管结扎后乳糜胸12例分析[J].实用医学杂志,2004,20(7):794-795. 被引量:4
  • 2傅剑华,胡袆,黄伟钊,杨弘,朱志华,郑斌.预防性胸导管结扎术在食管癌根治术中应用的评价[J].癌症,2006,25(6):728-730. 被引量:44
  • 3洪晶安.肠内营养对危重患者应激性溃疡出血的预防作用[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(6):491-492. 被引量:11
  • 4Soussain C, Ricard D, Fike JR,et al. CNS complications of radiothera- py and chemotherapy[J]. Lancet,2009,374(9701) :1639 -51.
  • 5Moreland SS. Nutrition screening and counseling in adults with lung cancer:a systematic review of the evidence [ J ]. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2010,14(5) :609 - 14.
  • 6Buijs N,van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Langius JA, et al. Perioperative arginine-supplemented nutrition in malnourished pa- tients with head and neck cancer improves long-term survival [ J ]. Am J Clin Nutr,2010,92(5) :1151 -6.
  • 7Baldwin C. Nutritional support for malnourished patients with cancer [ J ]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care,2011,5 ( 1 ) : 29 - 36.
  • 8Planas M, Penalva A, Burgos R, et al. Guidelines for colorectal canc- er: effects on nutritional intervention [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2007,26 ( 6 ) : 691 - 7.
  • 9Barret M, Malka D, Aparicio T, et al. Nutritional Status Affects Treatment Tolerability and Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients : Results of an AGEO Prospective Multicenter Study [ J ]. Oncology,2012,81 (5/6) :395 -402.
  • 10Kirkil C, Bulbuller N, Aygen E, et al. The effect of preoperative nutri- tional supports on patients with gastrointestinal cancer:prospective ran- domized study [ J ]. Hepatogastroenterology,2012,59 ( 113 ) : 86 - 9.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部