期刊文献+

双寡头一方垄断中间产品市场的纵向差异策略 被引量:15

Strategy of vertical production differentiation based on one of the duopolists monopolizes the intermediate product market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从产品纵向差异的角度出发,假设双寡头垄断市场中,一个企业在生产方面依赖于另一个企业,研究了双寡头企业的短期市场行为和长期市场行为:一是从短期的角度出发,将产品质量视为外生变量,研究了双寡头企业的产量策略和利润状况,并对均衡结果做了比较静态分析,研究结果表明,两个企业都有提高或降低各自产品质量的动机,取决于双方现有的产品质量水平;二是从长期的角度出发,将产品质量视为内生变量,研究了双寡头企业的质量与产量决策,研究结果表明,存在唯一的产品质量均衡,均衡质量没有表现出较大的差异化,而是表现出较小的差异化.此外,无论从短期的角度还是从长期的角度来看,都不存在高质量优势,相反,存在低质量优势. Supposing that an enterprise depends on another enterprise in production in a duopolistic market, the short-term and long-term market behaviors of the two enterprises are studied in the paper from the perspective of vertical products differentiation. From the short-term perspective, the paper assumes product quality to be an exogenous variable and examines the output strategy and profit conditions of duopolistic enterprises. Moreover, a comparative static analysis of the equilibrium results is made in the paper. The findings indicate that both enterprises have motives to increase or decrease their respective product quality, which depends on their present level of product quality. From the long-term perspective, with product quality assmumed as an endogenous variable, the paper analyzes the quality and output strategies of duopolistic enterprises. We proved that there exists a sole equilibrium in product quality of the duopolistic enterprises and high differentiation doesn' t appear, and there is just a slight difference in the quality of two kinds of products. In addition, there is no high-quality advantage either in the short-term or long-term market behaviors. In contrast, there exists a low- quality advantage.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期10-19,共10页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872046)
关键词 纵向差异 产品质量 高质量优势 转移价格 vertical differentiation product quality high-quality advantage transfer price
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Hotelling H. Stability in competition[J]. Journal of Economics, 1929, 39( 1 ) : 41 -57.
  • 2D' Aspremont C, Gabszewicz J J, Thisse J F. On Hotelling' s stability in competition [ J ]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (5) : 1145 - 1150.
  • 3Jeroen H, Charles V. On the limits and possibilities of the principle of minimum differentiation[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1999, 17 (5) : 735 - 750.
  • 4Bockem S. A generalized mode of horizontal product differentiation[ J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1994, 42(3) : 287 - 298.
  • 5Economides N. Minimal and maximal product differentiation in Hotelling' s duopoly [ J ]. Economics Letters, 1986, 21 (1) : 67 -71.
  • 6Andersin S P, Neven D J. Coumot competition yields spatial agglomeration[ J ]. International Economic Review, 1991, 32 (4) : 793 - 808.
  • 7Pal D. Does Coumot competition yield spatial agglomeration? [ J ]. Economics Letters, 1998, 60( 1 ) : 49 -53.
  • 8Gabszewicz J J, Thisse J F. Price competition, quality and income disparities[ J ]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1979, 20 (3) : 340 -359.
  • 9Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation[ J ]. Review of Economic Studies, 1982, 49 (1): 3-13.
  • 10Sutton J. Sunk Costs and Market Structure [ M ]. Cambridge : The MIT Press, 1991.

二级参考文献43

  • 1慕银平,唐小我,马永开.不对称竞争条件下的集团转移定价决策[J].控制与决策,2005,20(2):165-169. 被引量:15
  • 2陈宏民.允许后续企业进入的兼并策略及其福利研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):17-23. 被引量:5
  • 3慕银平,唐小我,马永开.存在产量和价格竞争外部市场的企业集团转移定价研究[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(2):104-109. 被引量:8
  • 4Hirshleifer J. On the economics of transfer pricing[J].J of Business, 1956,29 (3) : 172-184.
  • 5Solomons D. Divisional Performance, Measurement and Control[M]. Hornewood IL, 1965.
  • 6Horngren C T, Foster G. Cost Accounting. A Managerial Emphais[M]. NJ: Prentice Ha11,1987.
  • 7Arrow K. Control in large organizations [ J ].Management Science, 1964,10(3) ; 397-408.
  • 8Samuels J. Opportunity costing.. An application of mathematical programming [J ]. d of Accounting Research, 1965,3(2) : 182-191.
  • 9Benke R L Jr, Edwards J D. Transfer Pricing:Techniques and Uses [M ]. New York: National Association of Accountants, 1980.
  • 10Harris M, Kriebel C, Raviv A. Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation [J]. Management Science, 1982,28 (6) : 604-620.

共引文献53

同被引文献164

引证文献15

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部