期刊文献+

Evaluation and prediction of blast induced ground vibration using support vector machine 被引量:14

Evaluation and prediction of blast induced ground vibration using support vector machine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We present the application of Support Vector Machine (SVM) for the prediction of blast induced ground vibration by taking into consideration of maximum charge per delay and distance between blast face to monitoring point. To investigate the suitability of this approach, the predictions by SVM have been compared with conventional predictor equations. Blast vibration study was carried out at Magnesite mine of Pithoragarh, India. Total 170 blast vibrations data sets were recorded at different strate-gic and vulnerable locations in and around to mine. Out of 170 data sets, 150 were used for the training of the SVM network as well as to determine site constants of different conventional predictor equations, whereas, 20 new randomly selected data sets were used to compare the prediction capability of SVM network with conventional predictor equations. Results were compared based on Co-efficient of Determination (CoD) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between monitored and predicted values of Peak Particle Veloc-ity (PPV). It was found that SVM gives closer values of predicted PPV as compared to conventional predictor equations. The coef-ficient of determination between measured and predicted PPV by SVM was 0.955, whereas it was 0.262, 0.163, 0.337 and 0.232 by USBM, Langefors-Kihlstrom, Ambraseys-Hendron and Bureau of Indian Standard equations, respectively. The MAE for PPV was 11.13 by SVM, whereas it was 0.973, 1.088, 0.939 and 1.292 by USBM, Langefors-Kihlstrom, Ambraseys-Hendron and Bureau of Indian Standard equations respectively. We present the application of Support Vector Machine (SVM) for the prediction of blast induced ground vibration by taking into consideration of maximum charge per delay and distance between blast face to monitoring point. To investigate the suitability of this approach, the predictions by SVM have been compared with conventional predictor equations. Blast vibration study was carried out at Magnesite mine of Pithoragarh, India. Total 170 blast vibrations data sets were recorded at different strategic and vulnerable locations in and around to mine. Out of 170 data sets, 150 were used for the training of the SVM network as well as to determine site constants of different conventional predictor equations, whereas, 20 new randomly selected data sets were used to compare the prediction capability of SVM network with conventional predictor equations. Results were compared based on Coefficient of Determination (COD) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between monitored and predicted values of Peak Particle Velocity (PPV). It was found that SVM gives closer values of predicted PPV as compared to conventional predictor equations. The coefficient of determination between measured and predicted PPV by SVM was 0.955, whereas it was 0.262, 0.163, 0.337 and 0.232 by USBM, Langefors-Kihlstrom, Ambraseys-Hendron and Bureau of Indian Standard equations, respectively. The MAE for PPV was 11.13 by SVM, whereas it was 0.973, 1.088, 0.939 and 1.292 by USBM, Langefors-Kihlstrom, Ambraseys-Hendron and Bureau of Indian Standard equations respectively.
出处 《Mining Science and Technology》 EI CAS 2010年第1期64-70,共7页 矿业科学技术(英文版)
关键词 blast vibration support vector machine generalised predictor equations 支持向量机 预测方程 爆炸振动 地面振动 振动利用 评价 平均绝对误差 SVM
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Khandelwal M,Singh T N.Prediction of blast induced ground vibrations and frequency in opencast mine-a neural network approach.J Sound and Vibration,2006 (289):711-725.
  • 2Singh T N.A study of blast induced ground vibration at Dharapani Magnesite mine,Pitthoragarh Himalaya,India.In:Proceeding of 3rd Int Symp on Headwater Control.Oxford:Oxford and IBH Publishing House,1995.
  • 3Khandelwal M,Singh T N.Prediction of blast induced air overpressure in opencast mine.Noise and Vibration Worldwide,2005,36(2):7-16.
  • 4Khandelwal M,Singh T N.Evaluation of blast induced ground vibration predictors.Soil Dynam Earthq Engg,2007(27):116-125.
  • 5Langefors U,Kihlstrom B.The Modern Technique of Rock Blasting.New York:John Wiley and Sons,1963.
  • 6Ambraseys N R,Hendron A J.Dynamic Behaviour of Rock Masses,Rock Mechanics in Engineering Practices.London:John Wiley and Sons,1968.
  • 7Zacksenhouse M,Braun S,Feldman M.Toward helicopter gearbox diagnostics from a small number of examples.Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2000,14(4):523-543.
  • 8Scholkopf B,Burges C,Vapnik V.Extracting support data for a given task.In:Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Menlo Park:CA,AAAI Press,1995.
  • 9Schmidt M.Identifying speaker with support vector networks.In:Proceedings oflnterface 96.Sydney,1996.
  • 10Muller K R,Smola A,Ratsch G,Scholkopf B,Kohlmorgen J,Vapnik V.Predicting time series with support vector machines.In:Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks.London:Springer-Verlag,1997.

同被引文献193

引证文献14

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部