期刊文献+

避免审计判断偏误并增强其有效性初探 被引量:3

On Avoiding Errors of Audit Judgment and Enhancing its Effectiveness
原文传递
导出
摘要 审计判断是审计学研究的重点,审计师的审计判断能够影响到审计服务质量,提高审计服务的效率。本文以审计判断的有效性为出发点,通过文献研究分析了审计判断的两个重要命题"主体有效性假设"和"过程有效性假设",在此基础上分析了审计假设的框架效应、锚定效应、肯定效应和稀释效应等,有针对性地提出相关对策建议,以便改善审计师判断的准确性。 The audit judgment is the key point of auditing research. Auditor's audit judgment can affect the audit service quality, and enhance the audit service the efficiency. The article took the validity of audit judgment as the starting point, studied and analyzed two principal propositions of the audit judgment about "the main body validity supposition" and "the process validity supposition". The article has analyzed the audit supposition's frame effect, the anchor effect, the affirmation effect and the dilution effect. Finally it proposed the related countermeasure suggested that with the aim of improving the accuracy of audit judgment.
作者 李鹏
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期88-93,共6页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词 审计判断 有效性 综合效应 对策 Audit Judgment Validity Combined Effect Countermeasure
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Micheal Gibbins and Robert J Swieringa ,"Twenty years of Judgment Research in Accounting and Aeeounting",in :Ashton and Ashton ,Judgment and decision making research in accounting and auditing. New York: Cambridge University Press , 1995.
  • 2张继勋.审计判断研究:回顾与前瞻[J].审计研究,2002(1):17-21. 被引量:23
  • 3Mock , Theodore J ; Watkins , Paul R ; Caster , Paul ; Pincus , Karen; Edwards, Ward; A review of the Audit Judgment Symposium: 1983 -- 1992 , Discussion Auditing.
  • 4李嘉明,李兰芬,胡志涛.基于行为心理理论的审计判断模式构建[J].审计与经济研究,2008,23(6):26-30. 被引量:8
  • 5Ken,T.Trotman,王光远.审计判断研究:问题的提出、研究方法和未来方向(五)[J].财会月刊(合订本),2004(08A):3-4. 被引量:5
  • 6Ashton, R. H. and S. Kramer. ,1980," Students as Surrogates in Behavioral Accounting Research: Some Ev idence", Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 1- 15.
  • 7Hamilton, R. E. and W. Wright. ,1982, "Internal Con trol Judgments and Effects of Experience: replication and extensions", Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn) ,756 -765.
  • 8Krogstad, J., R. Ettenson, and J. Shanteau. ,1984, "Context and Experience in Auditors' Materiality Judgments", Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 54- 73.
  • 9张超,张晓岚.审计判断质量的评价标准研究:分析框架及应用[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,37(6):63-68. 被引量:4
  • 10Kahneman, D. , &Tversky, A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979 (47) :263-- 291.

二级参考文献26

  • 1张继勋.论审计判断模式[J].中国审计,2004(9):28-29. 被引量:6
  • 2管亚梅.论审计判断偏误的形成机制及其防治措施[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2005,25(10):50-53. 被引量:7
  • 3钟麒汴.审计任务环境中的职业判断框架[J].中国注册会计师,2006(4):29-31. 被引量:4
  • 4李春成.动机与激励:行政人员的行为心理分析.行政论坛,2001,(1):32-35.
  • 5Alison Sutcliffe, Paul Emile Roy. Professional judgment and the auditor[ M].经济科学出版社,2005.
  • 6杨明增,张继勋.审计判断中的锚定效应研究[J].审计研究,2007(4):43-47. 被引量:34
  • 7阿立森·萨特克利夫,保罗-埃米尔·罗伊著.王富利译.审计中的职业判断[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.
  • 8TROTMAN K T. Audit Judgment Research - Issues Addressed, Research Methods And Future Directions [ J ]. Accounting & Finance, 1998,38 (3) : 115-156.
  • 9MURRAY D, REGEL R W. Accuracy and Consensus in Accounting Studies of Decision Making [ J ]. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1992, (4) : 127-139.
  • 10ASHTON. An experimental study of internal control judgments[J]. Journal of Accounting research, 1974, 12 ( 1 ) :143-157.

共引文献35

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部