期刊文献+

论哈贝马斯关于审美领域规范性基础的阐释——兼及文艺学规范性之反思 被引量:4

On Habermas's Interpretation of Normative Foundation in the Aesthetic Sphere: With a Reflection on the Normativeness of Literary Theory as a Discipline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检视哈贝马斯关于审美领域规范性基础的阐释,进而反思文艺学规范性这一知识学得以展开的可能性。审美领域在现代拥有自身的规范性基础,因此可以用形式语用学加以阐释,但是它本身所具有的复杂性、模糊性和悖论性,使得其内在地违背普通语言的惯例,逃脱日常言语行为的以言行事力量之掌控。因而立足于现代审美领域的文艺学既拘宥于话语的价值合理性,又要应对"无言之美"的微妙灵韵,文艺学规范性基础的思考理应聚焦于这两者之间的连接点。 The essay studies Habermas's interpretation of normative foundation in the aesthetic sphere and reflects on the possibility of knowledge of literary theory as a discipline.The aesthetic sphere lays its own normative foundation in modernity,and thus is interpreted by formal pragmatics,but because of its complicatedness,ambiguity and paradoxes,it essentially conflicts with the convention of general language and frees itself from the illocutionary force of everyday speech acts.Therefore,literary theory,which is based on the modern aesthetic sphere,is bound to the validity claim of discourse and corresponds to mystical aura as beauty beyond language.A consideration of normative foundation of literary theory as a discipline should focus on the articulation between them.
作者 傅其林
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期40-47,共8页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金 国家社科基金项目青年项目"布达佩斯学派重构美学思想研究"(07cww001) 四川大学青年学术人才基金(2008-2012)成果
关键词 哈贝马斯 审美领域 规范性基础 文艺学 Habermas Aesthetic Sphere Normative Foundation Literary Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Jurgen Habermas. Questions and Counterquestions[C]// in Richard J. Bemstein ed. Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985.
  • 2哈贝马斯.交往行动理论:第1卷[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1994.
  • 3哈贝马斯.交往行动理论,第2卷[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1994..
  • 4Jurgen Habermas. Communication and the Evolution of Society [M]. Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston. Beacon Press, 1979.
  • 5Jurgen Habermas. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity [M]. trans, Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
  • 6Agnes Heller. General Ethics [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
  • 7特里·伊格尔顿.美学意识形态[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,1997.
  • 8Mark Neocleous. John Michael Roberts: The aesthetics of free speech: rethinking the public sphere EJ-]. Capital Class, Spring 2006.
  • 9Richard Rorty. Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity[C]//in Richard J. Bernstein ed. Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge. The MIT Press, 1985.
  • 10哈贝马斯.在事实与规范之间[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.

共引文献528

同被引文献22

  • 1Niklas Luhmann.Social System [M]. John Bednarz,Trans. California: Stanford University Press, 1995.
  • 2Agnes Heller.A Theory of modernity[M].London: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
  • 3Niknas Luhmann.The Reality of the Mass Media: Cultural memory in the present [M].Kathleen Cross, Trans.California. Stanford University Press, 1998.
  • 4Niklas Luhmann.The Autopoiesis of Social System[C ]//Felix Geyer and Jahannes, eds.Sociocybernetic paradoxes.London: Sage Publication Ltd, 1986.
  • 5Niknas Luhmann. Observations on modernity[M ]. William Whobrcy,Trans. California:Stanford University Press, 1998.
  • 6尼可拉斯·鲁曼.社会中的艺术[M].张锦惠,译.台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2009.
  • 7Jurgen Habermas.The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity [M ].Frederick Lawrence, Trans. Cam- bridge: Polity Press, 1987.
  • 8Niklas Luhmann.Art as s social system [M]. Eva Knodt, Trans.California: Stanford University Press, 2000.
  • 9Niklas Luhmann.Love as Passion: the codifica- tion of intimacy [M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1986.
  • 10Niklas Luhmann.Essays on self-reference [M]. New York :Columbia University Press,1990.

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部