期刊文献+

Evaluation of mercury speciation and removal through air pollution control devices of a 190 MW boiler 被引量:13

Evaluation of mercury speciation and removal through air pollution control devices of a 190 MW boiler
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Air pollution control devices(APCDs) are installed at coal-fired power plants for air pollutant regulation.Selective catalytic reduction(SCR) and wet flue gas desulfurization(FGD) systems have the co-benefits of air pollutant and mercury removal.Configuration and operational conditions of APCDs and mercury speciation affect mercury removal efficiently at coal-fired utilities.The Ontario Hydro Method(OHM) recommended by the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) was used to determine mercury speciation simultaneously at five sampling locations through SCR-ESP-FGD at a 190 MW unit.Chlorine in coal had been suggested as a factor affecting the mercury speciation in flue gas;and low-chlorine coal was purported to produce less oxidized mercury(Hg2+) and more elemental mercury(Hg0 ) at the SCR inlet compared to higher chlorine coal.SCR could oxidize elemental mercury into oxidized mercury when SCR was in service,and oxidation efficiency reached 71.0%.Therefore,oxidized mercury removal efficiency was enhanced through a wet FGD system.In the non-ozone season,about 89.5%-96.8% of oxidized mercury was controlled,but only 54.9%-68.8% of the total mercury was captured through wet FGD.Oxidized mercury removal efficiency was 95.9%-98.0%,and there was a big difference in the total mercury removal efficiencies from 78.0% to 90.2% in the ozone season.Mercury mass balance was evaluated to validate reliability of OHM testing data,and the ratio of mercury input in the coal to mercury output at the stack was from 0.84 to 1.08. Air pollution control devices (APCDs) are installed at coal-fired power plants for air pollutant regulation. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and wet flue gas desulftLrization (FGD) systems have the co-benefits of air pollutant and mercury removal. Configuration and operational conditions of APCDs and mercury speciation affect mercury removal efficiently at coal-fired utilities. The Ontario Hydro Method (OHM) recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was used to determine mercury speciation simultaneously at five sampling locations through SCR-ESP-FGD at a 190 MW unit. Chlorine in coal had been suggested as a factor affecting the mercury speciation in flue gas; and low-chlorine coal was purported to produce less oxidized mercury (Hg^2+) and more elemental mercury (Hg^0) at the SCR inlet compared to higher chlorine coal. SCR could oxidize elemental mercury into oxidized mercury when SCR was in service, and oxidation efficiency reached 71.0%. Therefore, oxidized mercury removal efficiency was enhanced through a wet FGD system. In the non-ozone season, about 89.5%-96.8% of oxidized mercury was controlled, but only 54.9%-68.8% of the total mercury was captured through wet FGD. Oxidized mercury removal efficiency was 95.9%-98.0%, and there was a big difference in the total mercury removal efficiencies from 78.0% to 90.2% in the ozone season. Mercury mass balance was evaluated to validate reliability of OHM testing data, and the ratio of mercury input in the coal to mercury output at the stack was from 0.84 to 1.08.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第2期277-282,共6页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the U.S.Agency for International Development (USAID) cooperation agreement(No.486-A-00-06-000140-00)
关键词 空气污染物 汞形态 控制装置 湿法烟气脱硫系统 评价 燃煤发电厂 空气污染控制设备 选择性催化还原 mercury speciation mercury removal air pollution control device field testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1Benson S A,Laumb J D,Crocker C R et al.,2005.SCR catalyst performance in flue gases derived from subbituminous and lignite coals[J].Fuel Processing Technology,86:577-613.
  • 2Eswaran S,Stenger H G,2005.Understanding mercury conversion in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts[J].Energy and Fuels,19(6):2328-2334.
  • 3Galbreath K C,Zygarlicke C J,Olson E S et al.,2000.Evaluating mercury transformation mechanisms in a laboratory-scale combustion system[J].Sci Total Environ,261:149-155.
  • 4Laudal D L,Pavlish J H,Brown T D et al.,2001.Pilot-scale evaluation of the impact of selective catalytic reduction for NOx on mercury speciation[C].Proceeding of the Air and Waste Management Association Annual Meeting,Orlando,Florida,June 24-28,2001.
  • 5Lee C W,Srivastava R K,Ghorishi S B et al.,2004.Investigation of selective catalytic reduction impact on mercury speciation under simulated NOx emission control conditions[J].Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association,54(12):1560-1566.
  • 6Tan Y W,Mortazavi R,Dureau B et al.,2004.An investigation of mercury distribution and speciation during coal combustion[J].Fuel,83:2229-2236.
  • 7USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency),1997.Mercury study report to congress Volume Ⅰ:Executive summary[S].Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development,EPA-452/R-97-003,Washington DC.
  • 8USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency),1998.Study of hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utility steam generating units-final report to congress[S].EPA-453/R-98-004a,Washington DC.

共引文献37

同被引文献138

引证文献13

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部