期刊文献+

收受财物后退还或者上交与受贿罪的认定——对“两高”受贿罪司法解释第9条的反思 被引量:5

On the Determination of Bribery Crime in Terms of Returning or Handing in Bribes after Accepting——Review of the Article 9 of Judicial Interpretation of the Bribery Crime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对司法实践中查处受贿犯罪时经常遇到的疑难、复杂问题,"两高"发布了及时查处、依法惩治新类型受贿犯罪的司法解释。细加分析"两高"受贿罪司法解释第9条的规定,不难发现其立场有违刑法受贿罪的规定,并且条文中"及时"、"掩饰犯罪"之用语不明确、欠严谨。因此,对"两高"受贿罪司法解释第9条进行反思,有助于厘清异议,正确适用刑法和司法解释解决受贿罪定性问题。 In judicial practice, investigating and dealing with bribery crimes often encountered many difficult and complex problems, so that Superme People' s Court and Superme People' s Procuratorate released the judicial interpretation in order to investigate and punish those new types of bribery crimes. But after detailed analysis, it is not difficult to find the regulation of the Article 9 in judicial interpretation is against the provisions in Criminal Law of accepting bribes ; and the items, "in time" and "covering up the crime", are not clear. Examining Article 9 of the bribery crime will help to apply Criminal Law and judicial interpretation correctly to resolve the issues about bribery crime.
作者 王玉杰
出处 《中州大学学报》 2009年第6期6-9,共4页 Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词 受贿罪 司法解释 及时 掩饰犯罪 bribery crime judicial interpretation in time covering up crime
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献25

共引文献34

同被引文献50

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部