美国宪法审查中的“衡量” 被引量：4

Balancing in American Constitutional Review

导出

摘要 "衡量"在美国宪法审查领域是头绪纷繁的,其适用范围及方式的发展变化以实用主义为典型表征。因而,衡量的运用在美国宪法审查领域趋于普遍、频繁的同时,又是不拘一格、灵活和富有弹性的。在由来已久的判例法传统和思维风格下,一方面法官拥有自为评价的判断余地;另一方面,借助司法的谦抑,并透过案件的不断类型化和判决中详尽的理由论述,法官灵活、实用的衡量运作得到有效约束,且不断地被反思和修正。 Balancing has multi-dimensions in American constitutional review, and the development of the ranges and modes of application of balancing has followed a path of pragmatism. Thus the application of balancing in American constitutional review has been flexibility and in a wide range and high frequency. In the context of tradition of case-law and thinking styles, judges of the supreme court have great power of discretion, and on the other hand, the flexibility of judges＇ balancing has been restricted effectively by the principle of judicial humility and categorization of cases.

作者余净植

机构地区中国浦东干部学院教研部

出处《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期167-171,共5页 Hebei Law Science

关键词宪法审查衡量实用主义定义式衡量 constitutional review （judicial review） balancing pragmatism definitional balancing

分类号 D971.21 [政治法律—法学] B087 [哲学宗教—哲学理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Iddo Porat. The Transformation of American Constitutional Balancing[ EB/OL]. http://law. bepress. com/expresso/eps, 2006-09-20访问.
2Melville B. Nimmer. The Right to Speak Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy[J]. 56 Cal. L. Rev. 935 (1968): p. 945, pp. 941 -945,pp.948-951, p. 939,.
3Jeffrey M. Shaman. Constitutional Interpretation: Illusion and Reality[ J]. 41 Wayne St. L. Rev. 135 (1994).
4John Rothchild, Menacing Speech and the First Amendment: A Functional Approach to Incitement That Threatens[ J]. 8 Tex. J. Women & L. 207 (1999).
5Eugene Vo lokh, Crime-Facilitating Speech[J]. 57 Stan. L. Rev. 1095 (2005).
6T. Alexander Aleinikoff. Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing[ J]. Yale L. J. Vol. 96, No. 5 ( Apr. , 1987) : pp, 979 - 981, p, 11301, p. 947.
7Norman T. Deutsch. Professor Nimmer Meets Professor Schauer (and Others) : An Analysis of "Definitional Balancing" as a Methodology for Determining the "Visible Boundaries of the First Amendment" [ J]. 39 Akron L. Rev. 483 (2006) : p. 537.
8Isaac Molnar. Resurrecting the Bad Tendency Test to Combat Instructional Speech: Militias Beware[ J]. 59 Ohio St. L.J. 1333 (1998) : p. 1369 n. 243.
9[日]藤仓皓一郎,等,段匡,杨永庄译.英美判例百选[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.24-26.
10胡玉鸿.关于“利益衡量”的几个法理问题[J].现代法学,2001,23(4):32-38. 被引量：89

二级参考文献17

1[2](美)E·博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.
2[3](美)詹姆斯·安修.美国宪法解释与判例[M].黎建飞译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994,145.
3[6](美)史蒂文·凯尔曼.制定公共政策[M].商正译,北京:商务印书馆,1990.114.
4[9]Karl Larenz.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥译.台北:五南图书出版有限公司,1996,313.
5[美]詹姆斯·安修黎建飞译.美国宪法判例与解释[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999..
6Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. (9 Weat. ) 1 (1824).
7张千帆.西方宪政体系(上册·美国宪法)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004..
8Jeffrey M. Shaman, Constitutional Interpretation: Illusion and Reality, Greenwood Press, 2001.
9Cass, R. Sunstein, Five Theses on Originalism, 19 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol' y (1996).
10[美]本杰明·卡多佐苏力译.司法过程的性质[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..