期刊文献+

内隐自尊、外显自尊及其交互作用对应对方式的影响研究 被引量:3

The Influence of Implicit and Explicit Self- Esteem and Their Interaction on the Coping Style
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了探讨内隐自尊、外显自尊及其交互作用对应对方式的影响,我们采用实验设计方法对某大学60名学生进行研究,选用自尊量表(SES)、应对方式问卷(CSQ)和内隐测验程序(IAT)施测。结果显示:一是内隐自尊、外显自尊存在低相关;二是外显自尊在积极、消极两种应对方式上主效应显著;三是不同外显自尊水平下,内隐自尊对积极应对方式有不同的影响。即高外显自尊水平下,高内隐自尊者比低内隐自尊者应用更多的积极应对方式;低外显自尊水平下,内隐自尊水平不影响积极应对方式的应用。由此可见,自尊类型影响个体应对方式,要培养个体安全的高自尊以促使个体在压力面前更多使用积极应对方式。 Purpose: To explore influence of implicit and explicit serf- esteem and their interaction on the coping style. Metheeds: Experimental research was used in the study. Self Esteem Scale ( SES), hnplicit Association Test (IAT) and Style Questionnaire (CSQ) were applied to 60 university' students. Results: 1. Implicit self-esleem and explicit self- esteem existed low correlation. 2. Explicit self- esteem had main effect in the positive and negative response. 3. The interaction of implicit self - esteem and explicit self - esteem on the coping style was significant, mean higher implicit self - esteem to use more positive coping style among high explicit self - esteem, while no difference among low self - esteem. So: The type of individual coping style affected self- esteem, therefore, to foster security high self- esteem in order to promote individual to use positive coping style more often in the face of pressure.
作者 张思远 刘洋
出处 《武警工程学院学报》 2010年第1期68-70,90,共4页 Journal of Engineering College of Armed Police Force
关键词 外显自尊 内隐自尊 应对方式 implicit self- esteem explicit self-esteem coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1李俊.3-9岁儿童的攻击性行为调查[J].心理发展与教育,1994,10(4):43-46. 被引量:16
  • 2陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷的项目分析[J].心理学报,1983,15(2):211-218. 被引量:381
  • 3蔡华俭,杨治良.大学生性别自我概念的结构[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):168-174. 被引量:56
  • 4[1]Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit Social Cognition: Attitude, Self-Esteem, and Stereotype. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1): 4~27
  • 5[2]Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6): 1464~1480
  • 6[3]Lowery B S, Hardin C D, Sinclair S. Social Influence Effects on Automatic Racial Prejudice. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(5): 854~855
  • 7[4]Teachman B A, Gregg A P, Woody S R. Implicit Association For Fear-Relavant Stimuli Among Individuals With Snake and Spider Fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2001,110(2): 226~235
  • 8[5]Teachman B A, Gapinski K D, Brownell K D, Rawlins M, Teyaram S. Demonstrations of Implicit Anti-Fat Bias: The Implicit of Providing Causal Information Causal Information and Evoking Empathy. Health Psychology, 2003, 22(1): 68~78
  • 9[6]Dasgupta N, McGhee D E, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36: 316~328
  • 10[7]Gawronski B. What Does the Implicit Association Test Measure? A Test of the Convergent and Discriminate Validity of Prejudice-Related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 2002, 49(3): 171~180

共引文献125

同被引文献6

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部