期刊文献+

供应链管理对企业财务绩效的影响研究 被引量:10

An Empirical Study on Financial Impact of Supply Chain Management Systems (SCM) Implementation by Chinese Listed Firms
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章选取我国2001-2006年间实施过供应链管理的上市公司前后共4年(从实施前一年到实施后两年)的数据作为样本,运用事件关联影响研究法并剔除行业均值的影响后进行实证研究以探究我国企业实施供应链管理的受益程度。实证结果显示:只有实施后第二年较实施前一年企业的现金周转期平均缩短了14.7天;管理和销售费用占比平均下降了1.01个百分点;营业利润率平均提高了2.49个百分点。其它业绩指标均没有显著的变化。从相关和回归分析的结果看,现金周转期的缩短导致管理、销售费用占比的下降,从而显著地驱动营业利润率的提高。本文的研究结果部分地回答了"信息技术生产率悖论"的问题,无论对学术界还是实务界均具有一定的现实意义。 But how much do the listed firms in China benefit financially from implementing SCM systems? To search for the answer to this question,the author conducts an Event Study Analysis to test whether the sample firms' financial indicators after adjusted for mean industry changes have changed. In this paper,we select the sample from all the listed firms which adopted SCM systems from the year of 2001 to 2006. The results of mean tests indicate that from one year before implementation to one year after implementation,no indicators have changed significantly. From the first year before implementation to the second year after implementation,cash conversion cycle (CCC) shortens 14.7 days on average; The ratio of Selling,General,and Administrative Expenses to Net Sales (SGA) significantly drops 1.01 percentage point; Return on sales (ROS) increases 2.49 percentage point. The correlation and regression analyses show: the shortening of CCC leads to the drop of SGA and further the increase of ROS. In addition,the study on the impact of Financial Supply Chain Management (FSCM) on corporate performance generates a conclusion that deserves further exploration. The conclusion of this paper is helpful to both academic circle and practitioners,because it partially explains" the Productivity Paradox of Information Technology".
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期94-104,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金重点课题(70731003)
关键词 供应链管理 财务绩效 事件关联影响研究法 实证研究 Supply Chain Management (SCM) Financial Performance Event Study Analysis Empirical Study
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Erik, Bu, njofsson. The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology[J]. Communication of the ACM, 1993, 36(12):66-67.
  • 2Sanjeev, Dewan and Kenneth L. Kraemer. International Dimensions of the Productivity Paradox[J]. Communication of the ACM, 1998, 41(8):56-62.
  • 3陆琨.美国物流供应链管理及其借鉴意义.上海物流,2006,(5):23-25.
  • 4Scannell,T.V., Vickery S.K. and C. L.Droge. Upstream supply chain management and competitive performance in the automotive supply industry[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2000, 21(1):23-48.
  • 5Bharadwaj, A.S.,Bharadwaj S. G.and B. R.Konsynski. Information-technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q [J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(7):1008-1024.
  • 6Dehning, B., Richardson V. J.and R. W.Zmud. The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(4):637-656.
  • 7Hendricks, K.B., Singhal V.R. The effects of supply chain glitches on shareholder weahh[J]. Journal of Operations management, 2003, 21(12):501-522.
  • 8Hendricks, K.B., Singhal V.R. and J.K.Stratman. The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM and CRM system implementations[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25:65-82.
  • 9Bruce, Dehning, Vernon J. and Robert W. Zmud Richardson. The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management svstems in manufacturing firms[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25:806-824.
  • 10欧佩玉,王平心.作业分析法及其在我国先进制造企业的应用[J].会计研究,2000(2):46-51. 被引量:153

二级参考文献69

共引文献414

同被引文献122

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部