期刊文献+

论20世纪心理咨询与治疗理论的四大对立倾向 被引量:3

Four Dichotomous Tendencies in Human Psychological Consultation and Treatment in the 20th Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过宏观地勾画20世纪人类心理咨询与治疗的演变和发展脉络,特别是通过阐明上世纪心理咨询与治疗的理论和方法中的"对立倾向",从而总体地展示该领域的重大成就。有四大对立倾向:1.是"无意识"起作用,还是"意识"起作用?2.是"问题本身"导向,还是"问题解决"导向?3.是"病态者"角度,还是"健康者"角度?4.是"功能障碍",还是"正常功能反应"?进化临床心理学的意义重大深远,它为我们理解什么是心理障碍提供了新颖而独到的视角,特别是为区分功能障碍与正常功能反应确立了可行的具体标准。 Through giving a clear picture of the evolution and development of human psychological consultation and treatment in the 20th century, the paper discusses the overall significant achievements of this field in general and the "dichotomous tendencies" in the theories and methods in particular. The following four major dichotomous tendencies can be identified in the process of psychological consultation and treatment : 1 ) Which plays the key role, the "unconscious" or the "conscious"? 2) Which dominates, the "problem itself" or the "problem solving"? 3) Which point of view is more effective, that of the "abnormal people" or that of the "normal people" 9 4) Is the problem diagnosed "dysfunctional" or "normally functional" ? It is also found that the contribution made by evolutionary clinical psychology is far-reaching, for it provides us not only with a unique perspective for looking at psychological disorders but also with concrete criteria for differentiating dysfunctional disorders from normal functions.
作者 熊哲宏
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期107-112,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(05JA720008) 全国教育科学"十五"规划重点课题(DBA050049) 上海市教育科学研究重点项目(A0411)
关键词 无意识与意识 问题与问题解决 病态者与健康者 功能障碍与功能正常 unconscious and conscious problem and problem solving abnormal and normal people dysfunction and normal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1熊哲宏.心灵深处的王国--弗洛伊德的精神分析学[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2000.
  • 2[美]斯蒂芬·A.米切尔、马格丽特·J·布莱克.弗洛伊德及其后继者--现代精神分析思想史[M].陈祉妍,等,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 3[美]B.R.赫根汉.心理学史导论:第四版[M].郭本禹,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 4[美]马裘丽·韦夏.认知治疗学派创始人--贝克[M].廖世德,译.上海:学林出版社,2007.
  • 5[美]Gerald Corey.心理咨询与治疗的理论及实践[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.
  • 6Buss, D. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind [M]. Boston: Pearson, 2004.
  • 7Cosmides, L. , Tooby, J. Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization [ A ]. In Hirechfield and Gelman (Eds), Mapping the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 8Pinker, S. How the mind works [ M]. New York: Norten, 1997.
  • 9张勇,熊哲宏.“觉察欺骗者模块”:推理的领域特殊性[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2005,23(4):47-52. 被引量:9

二级参考文献10

  • 1熊哲宏,王中杰.论高级认知系统的模块性——对J·福多“中心系统的非模块性”论证的反驳[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2004,3(5):104-109. 被引量:5
  • 2L. Cosmides., &J. Toody (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange [M]. In J. Barkow, etc. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionao'psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 3L. Cosmides, & J. Toody (1994). Origins of domain specificity:The evolution of functional organization [M]. In S. Gelman & L. Hirschfeld (FAs.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4L. Cosmides (1989).The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task [J]. Cognition, 31.
  • 5D. Buss (2004). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind [M]. Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
  • 6D. E. Over (2003). Evolution and the psychology of thinking: the debate [M]. New York: Psychology Press.
  • 7G. Gigerenzer & K. Hug (1992). Domain specific reasoning: social contracts, cheating, and perspective change [J].Cognition, 43.
  • 8V. E. Stone, et al. (2002). Selective impairment of reasoning about social exchange in a patient with bilateral limbic system damage [J]. http: //www. psych, ucsb. edu/research/cep/publist, htm.
  • 9福多.心理模块性[M].华东师范大学出版社,2002..
  • 10L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (1995). From function to structure [M]. In M. S. Gazzanjga (Eds), The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press.

共引文献8

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部