摘要
宋代理学家的文学批评有其独特的标准,为人强调"有德者必有言"的道德至上论;为文主张"文以载道"的道本文末论。根据这一标准,理学家在对屈原进行道德人格评价时,既充分肯定其忠君爱国精神,又批评其露才扬己、凸显君过的狂狷个性。而在评价其作品时,一方面赞扬其言之有物,另一方面又批评其不知"道"、不求"道"。这使得其楚辞研究呈现出强烈的理学化特征。
The idealists in Song Dynasty had their particular standards in literary criticism. They emphasized on a view that a person who is moral must have words. Also the standpoint that ＂Wen＂ should reflect ＂Dao＂ was very im- portant to them. According to this standard, the idealists criticized QU Quan＇ s personality. On the one hand, they af- firmed his loyalty and patriotism. On the other hand, they blamed his personality showing off his talent and revealing the emperor＇s shortcomings. Criticizing his works, they praised his works which include ideas. Not knowing ＂Dao＂ and not seeking ＂Dao＂ were refuted by them.
出处
《三峡大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2010年第2期50-53,57,共5页
Journal of China Three Gorges University(Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词
理学
文学
屈原
楚辞
Idealism
Literature
QU Quan
Elegies of the South
