期刊文献+

桥本甲状腺功能亢进与Graves病鉴别诊断的临床观察 被引量:5

Clinical investigations on differentiating Hashimoto's hyperthyroidism from Graves' disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)检查和甲状腺自身抗体检测在桥本甲状腺功能亢进(甲亢)与Graves病(GD)鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值。方法本组资料362例中有3例因样本细胞数量少而未能诊断,根据FNAC分型将359例甲亢患者分为桥本甲亢组119例、GD—Ⅰ组(间质淋巴细胞浸润〈10%)162例、GD-Ⅱ组(淋巴细胞浸润10%~20%)49例、GD-Ⅲ组(淋巴细胞浸润20%~40%)29例,观察4组甲状腺自身抗体及甲状腺激素水平的差异。结果FNAC发现淋巴细胞破坏上皮细胞以及退行性变和(或)嗜酸性变的滤泡上皮细胞时仅见于桥本甲亢组,为其特征性表现。GD—I、Ⅱ、Ⅲ3组FNAC检查可见淋巴细胞数量依次呈增加趋势,而滤泡上皮细胞增生呈降低趋势;3组平均血清甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TGAb)分别为(43.5±29.0)%、(61.3±24.4)%、(68.9±22.3)%,而平均甲状腺微粒体抗体(TMAb)分别为(38.0±26.1)%、(54.7±23.0)%、(60.8±22.7)%,与GD—I组相比,GD-Ⅱ、GD—Ⅲ组升高均有显著性差异(P〈0.05);3组的促甲状腺激素受体抗体(TRAb)水平分别为(57.7±71.0)U/L、(31.5±62.1)U/L、(21.2±47.0)U/L,与GD—I组相比,GD-Ⅱ、GD—m组显著降低(P〈0.01)。桥本甲亢组TGAb、TMAb均值显著高于GD—Ⅰ组(P〈0.01),而TRAb、游离T,(FT3)、游离T4(FL)均值显著低于GD—Ⅰ组(P〈0.01);桥本甲亢组与GD-Ⅱ、Ⅲ组相比,各抗体均值差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。GD—Ⅲ组病史均值显著长于其他3组(P〈0.01),而其他3组间差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。结论FNAC对鉴别桥本甲亢与GD各型具有重要的临床价值。血清TRAb、TGAb、TMAb水平对鉴别桥本甲亢与GD—Ⅰ型有-定临床价值,而对鉴别桥本甲亢与GD-Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型临床意义不大。 Objective To discuss the values of the fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and the measurement of the thyroid auto-antibodies in differentiating Hashimoto's hyperthyroidism (HILT) from Graves' disease(GD). Methods 3 FNAC specimens of 362 patients with hyperthyroidism were inadequate for diagnosis. The other 359 patients were divided into four groups based on the FNAC typing:119 cases of HHT, 162 cases of GD-Ⅰ,49 cases of GD-Ⅱ,29 cases of GD-Ⅲ. The differences in the levels of thyroid globin antibody (TGAb), thyroid nficrosome antibody (TMAb), and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) as well as free thyroid hormones (FT3, FT4 ) in the above four groups were investigated. Results The destroyed and metamorphic follicle-like epithelia were the characteristic pattern of FNAC in the group of HHT. In the groups of GD-Ⅰ, Ⅱand Ⅲ, with the increasing of the numbers of lymphocytes infiltration and the decreasing of the epithelia hyperplasia, the average levels of TGAb [ (43.5 ± 29.0) %, (61.3 ± 24.4) %, (68.9 ± 22. 3 ) % ] and TMAb [ (38.0 ±26. 1)% ,(54.7±23.0)% ,(60.8±22.7)% ] showed an ascending tendency in turn while the average levels of TRAb[ (57.7 ±71.0)U/L,(31.5 ±62.1)U/L,(21.2 ±47.0)U/L], FT3 and FT4 showed a descending tendency. The average levels of TGAb and TMAb in the HHT group were higher than those in the GD-Ⅰ group (P 〈 0.01 ), while the average levels of TRAb, FT3 and FT4 were lower than those in the GD-Ⅰ group (P 〈0.01 ). The differences in all the autoantibodies above between HHT group and the groups of GD-Ⅱ and GD-Ⅲ were not significant (P 〉0.05). The average duration of the diseases in the GD-B group was longer than that of the other groups (P 〈0.01 ),while there was no significant differences of the average duration in the other groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion FNAC has an important clinical value in differentiating HHT from GD-I,II and m, while the serum levels of TRAb, TGAb and TMAb have some clinical value in this differentiation from GD-Ⅰ but have little clinical value to differentiate HHT from GD-Ⅱ and Ⅲ.
出处 《国际内分泌代谢杂志》 2010年第2期76-79,F0003,共5页 International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
关键词 甲状腺功能亢进症 桥本甲状腺炎 GRAVES病 细针穿刺细胞学检查 甲状腺自身抗体 Hyperthyroidism Hashimoto's thyroiditis Graves' disease Fine-needle aspiration cytology Thyroid autoantibody
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献54

  • 1杜培宜,黄北春,裴学菊,代德兰,刘玲,郝阿芳,李瑞霞.自身免疫性甲状腺疾病细胞学变化与自身抗体及临床转归的关系[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,1995,11(3):150-153. 被引量:12
  • 2江昌新,王玲,谭郁彬,赵天如,刘云霞,赵海平,赵春歌.免疫学标记在甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学诊断中的应用[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2005,21(6):522-526. 被引量:9
  • 3李玉姝,赵冬,单忠艳,滕晓春,滕笛,关海霞,于晓会,范晨玲,崇巍,杨帆,戴红,谷晓岚,于扬,毛金媛,李佳,陈彦彦,杨榕,姜雅秋,李晨阳,滕卫平.不同碘摄入量地区甲状腺自身抗体的流行病学五年随访研究[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2006,22(6):518-522. 被引量:29
  • 4Ban Y, Tomer Y. Genetic susceptibility in thyroid autoimmunity. Pediatr Endocfinol Rev, 2005,3:20-32.
  • 5Benvenga S, Guarneri F, Vaccaro M, et al. Homologies between proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi and thyroid autoantigens. Thyroid, 2004,14:964- 966.
  • 6Tsatsoulis A. The role of stress in the clinical expression of thyroid autoimmunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006,1088:382-395.
  • 7Laurberg P. Victories and challenges in optimizing iodine intake. Thyroid, 2004,14:589.
  • 8Azizi F, Hedayati M, Rahmani M, et al. Reappraisal of the risk of iodine-induced hyperthyroidism: an epidemiological population survey. J Endocrinol Invest, 2005,28:23-29.
  • 9Laurberg P, Bulow Pedersen I, Knudsen N, et al. Environmental iodine intake affects the type of nonmalignant thyroid disease. Thyroid, 2001,11:457-469.
  • 10Mostbeck A, Galvan G, Bauer P, et al. The incidence of hyperthyroidism in Austria from 1987 to 1995 before and after an increase in salt iodization in 1990. Eur J Nucl Med, 1998,25:367- 374.

共引文献33

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部