期刊文献+

两种掰折安瓿方法的临床研究 被引量:4

Study for the difference of clinical application effect related to two ampoules opening methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对两种掰折安瓿方法的临床应用效果进行比较。方法将使用自制玻璃安瓿锯掰器掰折安瓿法设为实验组,传统的砂轮割锯纱布包垫掰折安瓿法设为对照组,对两种操作方法从药液有无污染、操作所用时间、安瓿玻璃微粒数、安瓿不规则破裂瓶数,以及两种操作方法对护士手划破的次数等方面进行比较。结果实验组在操作计时、安瓿不规则破裂瓶数、划破护士手的次数方面明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而两种操作方法对药液污染、产生玻璃微粒方面差异均无意义(P>0.05)。结论自制玻璃安瓿锯掰器掰折安瓿可明显提高护士的工作效率,避免了护士手的割伤,改善了护士的职业防护,提高了操作的安全性,同时减少了纱布的浪费,降低了医疗成本。 Objective To compare with the clinical application effect related to two ampoules opening ways. Method Self-made device for ampoules opening is selected as experimental group, traditional grinding wheel cutting combined with gauze is selected as control group. The liquid contamination, operating time, particles, irregular broken ampoules and the times of scratching hands between the two groups was observed and combined. Result The operating time, irregular broken ampoules and the times of scratching hands in the experiment group is better than that in the control group (P〈0.05). There is no significant difference related to contaminations and particles between the two group (P〉0.05). Conclusion The self-made opening device improves the work efficiency of the nurses and avoids the nurses' hands scratching with more operation safety and less medical costs.
出处 《护士进修杂志》 北大核心 2010年第5期390-392,共3页 Journal of Nurses Training
基金 江西省卫生厅科技计划项目 编号:20082030
关键词 掰折 安瓿 护理 Opening Ampoule Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献1

共引文献159

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部