1Maloney WJ, Herzwurm P, Paprosky W ,et al.Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1997,79:1628.
3Schmalzried TP,Fowble VA,Amstutz HC,et al.The fate of pelvic osteolysis after reoperation: no recurrence with lesional treatment.Grin Orthop, 1998,350:128.
2Salch KJ,Holtzman J,Gafni A, et al.Reliability and intraoperarive validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiobraphs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2001,83(7):1040.
3Knessl J, Gschwend H, Scheier U. Comparative study of cemented and cemendess hip prostheses in the same patient. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1989, 108:276
4Moutinho T, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Reviewing the data on survival rates of stems and cups in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85 (5): 970
5Sunchez - Sotelo J, Berry D J, Harmsen S. Long - term results of use of a coUared matte- finished femoral component fixed with second - generation cementing techniques. A fifteen - year - median follow -up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2002, 84 (9): 1636
6Goodman SB, Chin RC, Chious S, et al. A clinical - pathologic- biochenical study of the membrane surrourding loosened and nonloosened total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop, 1999, 224: 182
7Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85:27
8Oishie S, Walker RH, ColweU CJ. The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight - year follow - up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third - geveration cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1994, 76:1130
