摘要
目的:对《中国药典》2005年版中枳实的辛弗林含量及薄层鉴别提出疑议。方法:按照《中国药典》2005年版枳实中的测定方法对辛弗林含量进行定量分析,同时进行薄层鉴别。结果:大多数正品枳实中辛弗林含量极微,而其混淆品青皮中辛弗林含量较高。结论:《中国药典》2005年版中枳实辛弗林含量测定的结果不能反映枳实的真伪优劣。
Objective：Discussion about content determination and TLC of Synephrine from Fructus Aurantii Immaturus in Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2005 Edition. Methods： To determine the content of Synephrine and identify by TLC with the methods of Fructus Aurantii Immaturus in Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2005 Edition. Results： Synephrine of most of Froctus Aurantii Immaturus was very little, and its adulterant Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae Viride was very large. Conclusion ：The results of content determination of Synephrine from Fructus Aurantii Immaturus in Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2005 Edition cannot control its quality.
出处
《中国药品标准》
CAS
2010年第2期148-149,共2页
Drug Standards of China
关键词
枳实
混淆品
青皮
辛弗林
含量测定
Fructus Aurantii Immaturus
Adulterant
Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae Viride
Synephrine
Content Determination
