期刊文献+

多支冠脉血管病变分次PCI的近期临床疗效 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较多支冠状动脉病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)进行一次完全性血运重建术和分次完全性血运重建术的近期临床疗效。方法2005年12月至2008年10月接受PCI的多支冠脉血管病变完全血运重建患者,其中分次完全血运重建185例(88.1%),一次完全血运重建25例(11.9%);对比分析两组PCI术中及术后1年随访结果。结果两组术中、术后住院期间主要并发症(巨大血肿、假性动脉瘤、急性或亚急性血栓、再次血运重建等)、严重夹层、心律失常、住院期间死亡率均有统计学差异(P<0.05),分次完全血运重建组均低于一次完全血运重建组;术后12月随访:再狭窄率、心绞痛复发率、再次血运重建、非致死性急性心肌梗死及心功能无显著差异(P>0.05),心源性死亡发生率有统计学差异(P<0.05),分次完全性血运重建组低于一次完全性血运重建组(P<0.05)。结论多支冠状动脉病变完全血运重建行分次PCI近期临床疗效较好。
出处 《遵义医学院学报》 2009年第6期580-582,共3页 Journal of Zunyi Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Brannwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable anginaand non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction22summary article :a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina.)[S].IJACC, 2002,40(7) :1366.
  • 2Sea Hing Ong, IMBBS (Malaya), MRCP (UK), Victor YT Lim,2MB ChB (Glas), FRCP (Edin), FESC, Boon Cheng Chang,3MBBS (Aust), MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol), Jayaram ingamanaicker,3MBBS (Madras), MRCP (UK), FACC (USA), Chong Hiok Tan,3MBChb, MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol),Yew Seong Goh,3MBBS, MRCP (UK), Kok Soon Tan,3MBBCh (Dublin), MRCP (UK), FRCP (Edin) Three-Year Experience of Primary Percutaneous Goronary Intervention for AcuteST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Hospital without On-site CardiacSurgery[J]. Ann Aead Med Singapore,2009,38:1085-1090.
  • 3高招波,魏友平.多支冠状动脉病变的冠心病患者行完全或不完全血运重建对心功能的影响[J].实用临床医学(江西),2008,9(11):25-26. 被引量:1

二级参考文献3

同被引文献26

  • 1王晓军,崔连群,刘继东,王敏,盖玉生,李峰.大鼠颈动脉球囊损伤模型的建立和损伤血管的组织学观察[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2005,43(2):138-141. 被引量:10
  • 2许官学,石蓓,刘西平,郝星,赵然尊,刘志江,陶明,余国珍.PCI合并支架植入术治疗62例冠心病的初步体会[J].贵州医药,2005,29(4):320-322. 被引量:1
  • 3韩雅玲,李成洋,王效增,荆全民,王守力,马颖艳,栾波,王祖禄,王冬梅.多支冠状动脉病变完全及不完全介入性血运重建1年疗效的比较[J].解放军医学杂志,2006,31(6):512-514. 被引量:5
  • 4Sea Hing Ong,IMBBS (Malaya), MRCP (UK), Victor YT Lim,2MB ChB (Glas), FRCP (Edin), FESC, Boon Cheng Chang,3MBBS (Aust), MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol),Jayaram ingamanaicker,3MBBS (Madras), MRCP (UK), FACC (USA), Chong Hiok Tan,3MBChb, MRCP (UK), FAMS (Cardiol),Yew Seong Goh,3MBBS, MRCP (UK), Kok Soon Tan,3MBBCh (Dublin), MRCP (UK), FRCP (Edin) Three-Year Experience of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for AeuteST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infaretion in a Hospital without On-site CardiaeSurgery. December 2009, Vol. 38 No. 12.
  • 5Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW et al. ACC/ AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable anginaand non2ST2segment elevation myocardial infarction22summary article :a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)lJACC, 2002,40(7) :1366.
  • 6K Ramjane, L Han, C Jin. The diagnosis and treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Exp Clin Cardiol ,2008,13(3):121-128.
  • 7郭永和,周玉杰,赵迎新,等.不完全血运重建策略对老年冠状动脉多支血管病变患者预后的影响[J].中国介人心脏病学杂志,2012 , 20(1): 9-11.
  • 8Ribichini F, Taggart D. Implications of new ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease[J]. EurJ Cardio?tho rae Surg,2011 ,39(5) :619-622.
  • 9Braunwald E,Antman EM,Beasley rw.? al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable anginaand non-S'T-segment elevation myo?cardial infarction summary article: are port of the Ameri?can College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines[J].J ACC, 2002,40 (7) : 1366.
  • 10Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Long-term outcome of stents versus bypass surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic patients withmultivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of 5775 individual patient data[n. Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2012,5(4) :467-475.

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部