摘要
目的比较使用普通电切镜行经尿道前列腺剜除术(TUERP)和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的近期临床疗效。方法分别监测和记录TUERP和TURP患者术前及术后6个月的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评估(QOL)、最大尿流率(MFR)和膀胱残余尿量(RUV),进行比较观察。结果两组病人术后6个月在减轻排尿症状、改善生活质量、提高最大尿流率和减少膀胱残余尿量等尿动力学指标方面均较术前有显著改善,且TUERP组优于TURP组。结论 TUERP是治疗BPH的较好方法,值得推广。
Objective To compare the short-term clinical curative efficacy of the ordinary resectoscope transurethral enucleation of prostate （TUERP）with the transurethral resection of prostate（TURP）for benign prostatic hyperplasia（BPH）. Methods We monitored and recorded the voiding symptom score（IPSS）, quality of life index（QOL）, maximum flow rate（MFR）and bladder residual urine volume（RUV）in the patients in both the TUERP group and the TURP group before surgery and 6 months after that for a comparative observation. Results Six months after surgery, the patients of the two groups showed significant improvement in urinary symptoms and quality of life, as well as maximum urinary flow rate and bladder residual urine volume compared with pre-operation,the TUERP group being superior to the TURP group. Conclusion TUERP is a better way to treat BPH than TURP, worthy of popularization.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2010年第13期36-37,共2页
China Modern Doctor
关键词
经尿道前列腺切除术
电切镜
前列腺增生
尿动力学
Resectoscope transurethral enucleation of prostate
Transurethral resection of prostate
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Urodynamics
