期刊文献+

自由裁量之“自由”——兼论规划许可的效能优化 被引量:4

FREEDOM OF DISCRETION:ALSO ON PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION OF PLANNING PERMISSION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政自由裁量权有其存在的必然性和必要性,但目前规划许可中行使自由裁量权存在缺少明确的操作规则与程序设定、缺乏有效的监督与纠错机制等问题。从行政法学的角度,研究认为要规避这些负面问题,优化行政效能不应该简单的对规划行政自由裁量权"限权",而是应该选择合适的方式"控权",实现程序控权与实体控权的协调统一。首先,充实自由裁量控权依据,兼顾制约性规则与激励性规则、合法性标准与合理性标准;其次,完善"行政流程"的要素与程序设计,注重行政双方"交涉性"与"反思性",程序上赋予行政相对人和公众更多参与的权利,并设定行政主体在程序上相应的义务;第三,从增加违约成本、降低维权成本两方面双管齐下,形成对自由裁量的监督和纠错机制。 The administrative discretion is indispensable and necessary.But there are problems of discretion in planning permission including the absence of a clear set of rules and procedures to operate;the tendency of unlimited discretion based on private interests;lacking of effective mechanism for monitoring and controlling.From the perspective of Administrative Law,it is suggested that the discretion should be controlled based on the harmony of procedural and substantial power by proper means rather than simple restriction.This paper focuses on three issues to promote administrative performance:enriching law and regulations on discretion;improving the elements and procedure design of positive administration and increasing the cost of discretion default and reducing the cost of right-safeguarding.
作者 邓小兵 车乐
出处 《城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期46-52,共7页 City Planning Review
关键词 规划许可 效能优化 自由裁量 程序控权 实体控权 planning permission performance optimization discretion procedure control substantial control
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Booth P. Controlling Development: Certainty and Discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong[M].London: UCL Press,1996.
  • 2Qian Y.The Process of China' s Market Transition (1978-98):The Evolutionary, Historical, and Comparative Perspectives[J]. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2000, 15 (61).
  • 3毛昭晖.中国行政效能监察-理论、模式与方法[M].北京中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 4田莉.论开发控制体系中的规划自由裁量权[J].城市规划,2007,31(12):78-83. 被引量:19
  • 5李夙,刘钺.试论城市规划行政自由裁量权[J].规划师,2004,20(12):77-79. 被引量:2

二级参考文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部