摘要
分摊请求权不同于追偿请求权,是与连带责任相对应的制度。大陆法系的分摊请求权较为体系化,英美法上的分摊请求权具有较强的衡平法色彩。对不具有分摊能力连带责任人份额的再分配方案,大陆法系采用"事后二次分担规则",英美法系采用"事前二次分担规则",《民法通则》未对该问题作出规定。分摊请求权的产生基础是矫正正义。我国侵权法上应采大陆法系"事后二次分担规则"。
The right of contribution, corresponding to joint and several liability, is different trom the right of indemnification. The right of contribution in Civil Law System is relatively systematic, while it is more equitable in Anglo - Saxon Law System. For the mode of redistribution of the share of insolvent jointly and severally liable tortfeasor, Civil Law System adopts ＂post- redistribution rule＂, while the Anglo -Saxon Law adopts the pre -redistribution rule, which was not stipulated in The General Principles of Civil Law. The foundation of the right of contribution is corrective justice. Chinese Tort Law may follow the Civil Law tradition and adopt the post -redistribution rule.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期135-144,共10页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
分摊请求权
连带责任
衡平法
分摊不能份额
再分配
the right of contribution
joint and several liability
equity
uncontributable share
redistribution
