期刊文献+

苏南新农村绿化景观价值的综合评价 被引量:17

Preliminary Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation of Green Landscape of New Countryside in Southern Jiangsu Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了新农村绿化景观的内涵,提出在快速城市化背景下应对其生态价值、经济价值、美学价值和地方文化价值进行综合评价。利用层次分析法和Delphi法建立了综合评价模型,并选取常州市武进区城镇型村庄、城郊型村庄和乡村型村庄各2个进行研究。结果表明:6个村庄绿化景观的综合评价值中3个村庄属于"良好",3个村庄属于"一般",影响综合评价值的主要因子是生态价值和美学价值;3种类型村庄绿化景观的综合评价值均值大小是乡村型村庄>城镇型村庄>城郊型村庄,其中经济价值、生态价值和美学价值的均值大小是乡村型村庄>城镇型村庄>城郊型村庄,地方文化价值是城镇型村庄>乡村型村庄>城郊型村庄;单个村庄绿化的美学价值和地方文化价值波动较大。此外,分析了各类型村庄绿化景观评价值高低的原因,总结绿化工作得失,对未来新农村绿化建设提出建议。 The connotation of rural green landscape was discussed. The purposes of integrated evaluation are to appropriately assess ecological, economic, aesthetic and cultural values of rural green landscape during rapid urbanization. Based on this, the model of integrative evaluation was constructed by Delphi and analytic hierarchy process, and applied to two urban-type villages, two suburban villages and two remote suburban villages in Wujin district, Changzhou City. The following results arc obtained. The comprehensive assessment indexes of the three villages are "better" and the others are "ordinary". Ecological and aesthetic values are the main factors in this evaluation. Remote suburban villages and suburban villages have the maximum and minimum comprehensive evaluation value respectively. The mean value of ecological, economic and aesthetic values of green landscape in these three type villages is: remote suburban villages 〉 urban-type villages 〉 suburban villages. The mean value of cultural value is : urban-type villages 〉 remote suburban villages 〉 suburban villages. The four values of each village were evaluated and the main differences were aesthetic and cultural values. Furthermore, the reasons of evaluation results were analyzed and the advice for future rural greening was given.
出处 《北京大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期371-378,共8页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis
基金 江苏省建设厅科技项目(JS2007JH18) 住房和城乡建设部2009年科学技术项目计划(2009-R2-40)资助
关键词 农村绿化景观 综合评价 指标体系 新农村 rural green landscape comprehensive evaluation index system new countryside
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Lagro J A. Landscape context of rural residential development in southeastern Wisconsis ( USA ). Landscape Ecology, 1995, 13(2) : 65-77.
  • 2Onate J J. Agro-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscape: the role of indicators as valuing tools for evolution. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15(6): 271-280.
  • 3Iiyama N, Kamad M, Nakagoshi N. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 70:301-313.
  • 4Nijnik M, Zahvoyska L, Nijnik A, et al. Public evaluation of landscape content and change: several examples from Europe. Land Use Policy, 2008, 26:77-86.
  • 5Sayadi S, Gonzalez-Roa M C, Calatrava-Requena J. Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in southeastern Spain. Ecological Economics, 2005, 55: 539- 550.
  • 6Daniel T C. Whither scenic beauty visual landscape quality assessment in the 21th century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 54(6): 267-281.
  • 7Arriaza M, Carnas-Ortega J F, Canas-Madueno J A, et al. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 69:115-125.
  • 8Bulut Z, Yilmaz H. Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 141:121-129.
  • 9Bulut Z, Yilmaz H. Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 154: 459-468.
  • 10Tahvanainen L, Ihalainen M, Hietala-Koivu R, et al. Measures of the EU Agri-Environmental Protection Scheme (GAEPS) and their impacts on the visual acceptability of Finnish agricultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 66 : 213-227.

二级参考文献285

共引文献1155

同被引文献173

引证文献17

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部