摘要
目的通过与改良Kupperman评分和Greene评分系统比较,探讨MRS评分系统评价围绝经期及绝经后妇女相关症状的严重程度及对生活质量影响的有效性。方法选择2005年3月至2005年9月北京大学第一医院妇科门诊43～58岁围绝经期及绝经后妇女共157例。采用改良Kupperman评分、Greene评分及MRS评分系统分别对其围绝经期及绝经后症状进行评分。结果改良Kupperman评分与MRS评分之间呈正相关(r=0.785,P<0.01),MRS评分与Greene评分之间呈正相关(r=0.864,P<0.01)。结论 MRS评分是评价围绝经期及绝经后妇女相关症状及其对生活质量影响的有效工具。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the Menopause Rating Scale（MRS） for scoring symptoms of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women by comparison with the modified Kupperman index and Greene climacteric scale.Methods A population sample of 157 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women who had been selected from the gynecological outpatient of our hospital completed the questionnairs of the MRS,the modified Kupperman index and Greene climacteric scale from March,2005 to September,2005.Results A comparison result of the MRS with the modified Kupperman index showed a high correlation of raw scores（r=0.785,P〈0.01）.There was a strikingly positive association between the MRS and Greene Scale（r=0.864,P〈0.01）.Conclusions The MRS is a valuable modern tool for assessment symptoms of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.The MRS could serve as suitable instrument for evaluation the life quality of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
出处
《中国妇产科临床杂志》
2010年第3期195-197,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
