摘要
长期以来,在有关民事责任承担的理论中,民事行为能力决定民事责任能力这种错误的学说处于支配性地位,并以此指导我国的民事立法,导致我国《侵权责任法》第32条关于被监护人侵权责任的规定存在严重的缺陷。民事责任能力与行为能力无关。相反,民事权利能力才是民事责任能力的源泉,民事权利能力与民事责任的承担资格存在必然的逻辑应对关系。唯有如此,才能构建合理的被监护人侵权责任制度。
In the past years,in the theory of undertaking civil liability,wrong doctrine of capacity for civil conduct determining civil liability is in the dominant position and guides our country＇s civil legislation.This results in serious flaws in our country＇s ＂Tort Liability Act＂ Article 32 on the tort liability provisions of the ward.The capacity for civil liability has nothing to do with the capacity for civil conduct.In contrast,capacity for civil right is the source of capacity for civil liability,and undertaking civil liability exists in a natural logical relationship.Only in this way,can we build a reasonable system of tort liability of the ward.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期49-53,共5页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
江西省"十一五"社会科学规划课题"民事权利能力制度研究"(06FX19)
关键词
民事权利能力
民事责任
民事行为能力
监护责任
capacity for civil right
civil liability
capacity for civil conduct
liability of guardianship
