期刊文献+

委拉斯凯茨的“镜中之镜”——论傧相(《Las Meninas》)

Mirror's Mirror of Velaquez——On Las Meninas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《傧相》是委拉斯凯茨的杰作,但似乎拒绝解释,有鉴于此,解释纷至沓来,既有艺术史家和艺术批评家,更有哲学家侧身其中,比如福科和塞尔。也许放弃解释,或者把图像看作"行为"或"图像游戏"方可靠近难以索解的《傧相》。 Las Meninas, Velaquez's masterpiece, seems to defy explanation. Just for this reason, so much explanation has been made by various people, including Art Historian, Art Critic, particularly philosopher, such as Michel Foucault and John R-Searle. Maybe giving up explanaetion regarding image as action or image game could approach unreachable Las Meninas.
作者 黄家瑾
出处 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期42-45,共4页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目"哲学中的视觉问题研究"[06JA720020]
关键词 委拉斯凯茨 傧相 镜中之镜 Velaquez Las Meninas mirror's mirror
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Velazquez.Maurice SerullazLMJ.The Library of Great Painters, 1981.
  • 2Michel Foucault.The Order of Things [ M ].Vintage Books, 1973.
  • 3W. J. T. Mitchell.The Language of Images[M].The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 4Erwin Panofsky.Perspeetive as Symbolic Form[M]. Zone Books, 1991.
  • 5Velazquez.Joseph-emile Muller[M].Thames and Hudson, 1976.
  • 6Michel Foucault.This is not a Pipe [M].Translated and Edited by James Harkness,University of California Press, 1983.
  • 7Jose Gudiol.The Complete Paintings of Velazquez [M].Greenwich House, 1983.
  • 8Velazquez.Endque Lafuente Ferrari [ M ].Editions D' Art Albert Skira, 1960.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部