期刊文献+

冲突性话语趋异取向的语用分析 被引量:166

A pragmatic study of the divergence orientation of conflict utterances
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以人际交往中常见的冲突性话语为研究对象,首先分析它们对人际关系建构与解构的语用效应,列举并探讨冲突性话语引发中的主要语言手段;再从语用学的角度,借助人际交往的适应论,参照类似语言手段选择的和谐取向,重点分析冲突性话语引发的趋异取向,意在揭示非和谐类话语出现的语用理据,为人际交往中对撞性话语的研究提供新视角。 This paper explores the divergence orientation of conflict utterances in interpersonal interaction from a pragmatic perspective.After discussing their pragmatic effects in the constructive and deconstructive processes of interpersonal relationships,it focuses its attention on the linguistic devices triggering conflict utterances in interaction.Then on the theoretical basis of Accommodation Theory,the study has analyzed the divergence orientation of such utterances in relation to Spencer-Oatey’s rapport orientation of linguistic choices in interpersonal interaction.The findings can provide new perspectives on the pragmatic motivations of such utterances in communication.
作者 冉永平
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期150-157,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科基金项目"英汉语中冲突性话语的构建模式及其制约机制的语用分析"(批准号:09BYY070)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Boggs, S. T. 1978. The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children [J]. Language in Society 7: 325-344.
  • 2Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 3Boxer, D. 2002. Nagging: The familial conflict arena [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 49-61.
  • 4Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Eisenberg, A. & C. Garvey. 1981. Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts [J]. Discourse Processes 4: 149-170.
  • 6Farris, C. S. P. 2000. Cross-sex peer conflict and the discoursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 32 : 539-568.
  • 7Giles, H. & P. Powesland. 1997. Accommodation theory [A]. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (eds.). Sociolinguistics : A Reader and Coursebook [C]. London: The Macmillan Press, 232-239.
  • 8Goodwin, M. H. 1983. Aggravated correction and disagreement in children's conversations [J]. Journal ofPragmatics 7 : 657-677.
  • 9Grimshaw, A. D. 1990. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversation[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Kuo, S. H. 1992. Formulaic Opposition Markers in Chinese Conflict Talk University Roundtable Linguistics: 388-402 [C]. Georgetown on Languages and.

二级参考文献60

共引文献458

同被引文献1109

引证文献166

二级引证文献598

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部