期刊文献+

居住区生态服务功能补偿研究——以扬州海德公园居住区为例 被引量:1

Study on Ecological Service Compensation of Residential Communities——With Yangzhou Haide Park as the Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 改善生态是风景园林的3大作用之一,衡量生态功能的变化是衡量居住区环境变化的一个重要方面。从生态服务功能的角度出发,提出生态服务功能补偿的概念,并对4个相关指标,即绿当量、径流、温度和固碳量来进行测度。绿当量从总体上反映了生态服务功能的变化,而其他3个指标分别从气候、水文以及对二氧化碳固定等人类对环境主要影响的方面进行了测度,通过对比居住用地建设前后指标的变化情况,更为定量和定性地了解建设对环境的影响,从而为绿地的规划和配置提供指导。以扬州海德公园居住区为例进行了实例分析。 Ecological function is one of the three basic functions of landscape.It is the main aspect of evaluating the ecological function changes of residential area.The article stands on the point of ecological service function and proposes the concept of ecological service compensation.It uses four related indices to measure the changes,which are green equivalent,runoff,temperature and carbon fixation.The green equivalent reflects the changes of ecological service function generally,while the other three indices measure human influence on environment from the aspects of climate,water and carbon dioxide fixation.By comparing the indices changes before and after the residential area construction,the influence of construction on environment can be understood more quantitatively and qualitatively,and the information can guide the green space planning and arrangement.The article also uses the Haide Park Residential Community as an example to illustrate the analysis process.
出处 《中国园林》 北大核心 2010年第3期85-89,共5页 Chinese Landscape Architecture
关键词 风景园林 生态服务功能补偿 绿当量 径流 绿地 landscape architecture ecological service compensation green equivalent runoff green space
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献26

共引文献580

同被引文献52

  • 1王如松,叶亚平.中国的生态市建设[J].AMBIO-人类环境杂志,2004,33(6):319-320. 被引量:2
  • 2程承旗,李启青,沙志友,郭仕德.城市居住单元环境质量的高分辨率遥感评价方法研究[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(1):24-30. 被引量:13
  • 3MUKHERJEE M, RAY A K, RAJYALAKSHMI C. Physical quality of life index: Some international and Indian applications [J]. Social Indicators Research, 1979, 6(3):283 -292.
  • 4VAN KAMP I, LERDELME[JER K, MARSMAN G, et al. Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: a literature study[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 65: 5-18.
  • 5CILLIERS E J. Sustainable green urban planning: the Green Credit Tool [J]. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2010, 3(1): 57-66.
  • 6DOBSON A D, BRADSHAW A D, BAKER A J M. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology [J]. Science, 1997, 277: 515-524.
  • 7Register R. Eco-city Berkeley: Building cities for a healthy future [M]. USA: North Atlantic Books, 1987:122-131.
  • 8PACIONE M. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: a social geographical perspective[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, Volume 65, Issues 1-2: 19-301.
  • 9SU M, FATH B D, YANG Z. Urban ecosystem health assessment: A review [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408: 2425-2434.
  • 10KOICHIRO M, ARIS C. Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI)[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2012, 32: 94-106.

引证文献1

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部