期刊文献+

由精密控制人工震源观测到的绵竹5.6级地震前后波速变化 被引量:43

Velocity changes observed by the precisely controlled active source for the Mianzhu M_s 5.6 Earthquake
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地震危险区断层的应力状态变化及其精确测量一直是地球物理学关注的热点问题之一,主动震源探测技术的发展为解决上述问题带来了可能.汶川大地震后,结合汶川地震断裂带科学钻探,在四川省绵竹市九龙镇——跨越龙门山断裂带前山断裂,利用10 t精密控制人工震源进行了连续监测试验,在试验观测期间的2009年6月30日凌晨2时3分,当地发生了M_s 5.6级地震,地震前后观测数据的对比分析表明,该地震发生前后,穿过断裂带的直达S波走时发生了时延为5~9 ms的微弱变化,射线路径上的平均波速相对下降了约0.3%,该时延主要是由地震同震效应引起的断裂带内应力调整和物性变化造成的.所使用的精密控制人工震源性能稳定,适于开展断层监测.这一结果对于发展断裂带主动震源动态监测技术具有重要意义. The stress status change and its exact measurement of the fault zone has been a hotspot in geophysics. After the Wenchuan earthquake, we carry out continuous monitoring across the range-front fault of the Longmenshan fault zone, using a 10-ton precisely controlled active source. An Ms5.6 earthquake happened at 02∶03 in the morning of June 30th 2009 near the experimental site. and the direct S wave velocity across the fault zone occurred a slight change by comparative analysis of data before and after the earthquake. Time delay is up to 5~9 ms, the S wave velocity decreased ~0.3%. The time delay was mainly caused by the stress change within the fault zone due to the earthquake.
出处 《地球物理学报》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期1149-1157,共9页 Chinese Journal of Geophysics
基金 国家科技支撑计划"汶川地震断裂带科学钻探-主动震源探测及发震断裂的走时变化监测" 地震行业专项(200808002) 国家自然科学基金(40874095)资助
关键词 绵竹地震 波速变化 精密控制人工震源 动态监测 反褶积 Mianzhu earthquake Velocity change Precisely controlled active source Dynamic monitoring Deconvolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1James H Dieterich.Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip.Pure and Applied Geophysics,1978,116(4):790-806.
  • 2Keiiti Aki.Asperities barriers characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction.J.Geophys.Res.,1984,89:5867-5872.
  • 3Rice J R.Fault stress states,pore pressure distributions,and the weakness of the San Andreas fault.In:Evans B,Wong T-F eds.Fault Mechanics and Transport Properties of Rocks,Number 475 - 503.Academic,San Diego,Calif.,1992.
  • 4Scholz C H.Microfracturing and the inelastic deformation of rock in compression.J.Geophys.Res.,1968,73:1417 -1432.
  • 5Scholz C H.The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting.New York:Cambridge Univ.Press,2002.
  • 6Fenglin Niu,Paul G Silver,Thomas M Daley,et al.Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfield SAFOD drill site.Nature,2008,454,doi:10.1038/nature07111.
  • 7Wang B S,Zhu P,Chen Y,et al.Continuous in-situ measurement of stress-induced travel time variation with coda interferometry.Eos Trans.AGU,87 (52),Fall Meet.Suppl.,Abstract S44B-04,2006.
  • 8Wang B S,Zhu P,Chen Y,et al.Continuous subsurface velocity measurement with coda wave interferometry.J.Geophys.Res.,2008,113,B12313,doi:10.1029/ 2007JB005023.
  • 9Reasenberg P,Aki K.A precise,continuous measurement of seismic velocity for monitoring in situ stress.J.Geophys.Res.,1974,79:399-406.
  • 10Ikuta R,Yamaoka K.Temporal variation in the shear wave anisotropy detected using the Accurately Controlled Routinely Operated Signal System.J.Geophys.Res.,2004,109,B09305,doi:10.1029/2003JB002901.

二级参考文献40

共引文献179

同被引文献363

引证文献43

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部