期刊文献+

慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期疗效满意度问卷评价研究 被引量:11

Study on the Efficacy Satisfaction Scale for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at Stable Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价疗效满意度问卷在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)稳定期的信度、效度和反应度。方法选取2008年1-10月河南中医学院第一附属医院呼吸科收治的155例COPD稳定期患者进行问卷调查,以Cronbach’α、Guttman分半系数和重测信度评价问卷信度,以内容效度和结构效度评价问卷效度,以治疗前后量表均分比较评价反应度,以应答率评价可行性。结果疗效满意度测评问卷在COPD稳定期的Cronbach’α系数为0.906、Guttman分半系数为0.758,工作生活能力、临床症状、治疗效果、治疗方便的Cronbach’α系数分别为0.905、0.645、0.788、0.793;问卷各领域与其所包含的条目相关系数绝对值在0.70~0.87之间,共提取3个公因子;各领域积分改善均为较大效应尺度变化;问卷有效应答率91.2%。结论疗效满意度问卷在COPD稳定期的应用具有良好的信度,内容效度较好,结构效度一般,能较好地区分治疗效果。 Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity and responsibility of the efficacy satisfaction scale for COPD patients at stable stage. Methods One hundred and fifty-five COPD patients at stable stage were selected from January to October of 2008. All subjects came from The First Affiliated Hospital of Heart College of TCM. The Cronbach' a coefficient, Guttman split-half coefficient and re-test reliability were used as the indexes to reflect the reliability of the scale. The content validity and the construct validity were used to evaluate the validity of the sacle. The average score between pre-treatment and post-treatment was compared to evaluate the feasibility. Results The Cronbach'a coefficinent and Guttman split-half coefficinent of the efficacy satisfaction scale for COPD at stable stage respective was 0.906 and 0.758. The Cronbach'a coefficinent of the four domains respective were 0.905 (working and life ability), 0.645 (clinical symptoms), 0.788 (efficacy) and 0.793 (therapy convenience) for the efficacy satisfaction scale. The correlation coefficient between the four domains and it's items were within 0.70-0.87. The factor analysis of the scale extracted three common factors. The scores improvement with four domains was of great effect size change. The effective response rate was 91.2%. Conclusion The efficacy satisfaction scale for COPD patients at stable stage has better reliability, good content validity and common construct validity which could better distinguish therapeutic efficacy.
出处 《中国中医药信息杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第6期8-10,共3页 Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2006BA104A13-02)
关键词 疗效满意度问卷 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 稳定期 信度 效度 反应度 efficacy satisfaction scale COPD: stable stage reliability: validity: responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Richard Shikiar, Anne M Rentz. Satisfaction with medication: An overview of conceptual, methodologic, and regulatory issues[J]. Value in Health, 2004,7(2): 204-215.
  • 2Bech P, Moses R, Gomis R. The effect of prandial glucose regulation with repaglinide on effect satisfaction, wellbeing and health status in patients with pharmacotherapy-naive type 2 diabetes: A placebo-controlled, multicenter study[J]. Qual life Res, 2003,12(4): 413-425.
  • 3Evans CJ, Trudeau E, Mertzanis P, et al. Development and validation of the Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in patients with chronic or acute pain[J]. Pain, 2004,112(3): 254-266.
  • 4Green J, Kleinman L, Ciesia G, et al. Subcutaneous injection survey : psychometric evaluation of a effect satisfaction instrument associated with a novel HIV medication[J]. HIV Clin Trials, 2002,3(4): 387--395.
  • 5邓春华,孙祥宙.应用新的治疗满意度量表来评估ED患者及其性伴侣对伐地那非治疗的满意度[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(9):716-719. 被引量:4
  • 6慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17. 被引量:8235
  • 7李建生,余学庆.患者治疗满意度测量工具建立与应用的初步探讨[J].河南中医学院学报,2008,23(2):9-13. 被引量:6

二级参考文献34

共引文献8240

同被引文献129

引证文献11

二级引证文献163

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部