期刊文献+

Coflex系统植入术及全椎板减压植骨融合内固定术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的短期疗效对比观察 被引量:18

Comparison of short term outcome in the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis with Coflex implant versus laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion along with pedicle screw system
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]对比Coflex系统植入与全椎板减压植骨融合、椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的短期疗效。[方法]抽取连续的30例住院治疗的退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者,随机分为两组,每组15例,分别施行Coflex系统植入和全椎板减压植骨融合椎弓根螺钉内固定术,观察比较两组的手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间、术前和术后6个月JOA评分,术后改善率及并发症情况。[结果]与传统减压融合术相比,Coflex组术后6个月JOA评分及术后改善率无明显差异,而手术时间、出血量及住院时间显著降低。随访期间Coflex组无1例发生术后并发症。[结论]Coflex植入系统是一种安全、有效、微创的治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的新术式,具有较好的临床应用前景。 [Objective]To compare the short term outcome in treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis with Coflex implant versus laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion along with pedicle screw system. [Methods]Thirty patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis were randomly divided into two groups.Fifteen patients in the control group were treated with laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion along with pedicle screw system. The other 15 patients in the experiment group were treated with Coflex implant. The parameters for assessment included operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,pre- and postoperative JOA score,improvement rate and complication rate.[Results]Compared to the control,significant reduction was found in terms of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and hospital stay in the experiment group.No significant difference was found regard to the improvement rate and postoperative JOA score. In addition ,there was no complication in the Coflex group during the follow-up.[Conclusion]Coflex implant is an effective,save and minimally invasive surgical method for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期888-891,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 Coflex系统 全椎板减压植骨融合内固定术 退行性腰椎管狭窄症 Coflex laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion along with pedicle screw system degenerative lumbar stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献23

  • 1Multi-slice spiral CT 3-dimensional reconstruction tech-nique to treat multi-segmental degenerative spinal steno-sis with traumatic instability of lower cervical spine[J].Chinese Journal of Traumatology,2009,12(1). 被引量:5
  • 2刘汝落.腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(19):1514-1516. 被引量:69
  • 3Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective longterm study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis [ J ]. Spine, 2004, 29 : 726 - 734.
  • 4Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation [ J ]. Spine, 1997, 22 : 2807 - 2812.
  • 5Ware JE. SF -36 health survery:manual and interpretation guide [ M]. 1^st ed. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993, 189-193.
  • 6Lee CK, Rausching W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression [J]. Spine, 1988, 13:313-320.
  • 7Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina JS, et al. Abnormal magnetic - resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects : a prospective investigation [ J]. JBJS(Am) , 1990, 72 : 403 - 408.
  • 8Fischgrund JS. The argument for instrumented decompressive posterolateral fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis[J]. Spine, 2004, 29: 173- 174.
  • 9Phillips FM. The argument for noninstrumented posterolateral fusion for patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis [J]. Spine, 2004, 29:170-172.
  • 10Hansraj KK, O' Leafy PF, Cummisa FP, et al. Decompression, fusion and instrumentation surgery for complex lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Clin Orthop, 2001 , 384:18 -25.

共引文献107

同被引文献194

引证文献18

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部