摘要
目的:探讨BD预设型动脉采血器与普通注射器抽取动脉血的临床效果。方法:对80例患者同时进行BD预设型动脉采血器与普通注射器穿刺抽取动脉血进行比较,对误抽静脉血率、一针穿刺成功率、混入气泡率、穿刺局部皮下血肿和瘀斑发生率、穿刺后压迫时间、疼痛程度、血气分析结果进行比较。结果:预设型动脉采血器误抽静脉血率、混入气泡率、穿刺局部皮下血肿和瘀斑发生率、疼痛程度明显低于普通注射器,穿刺后压迫时间减短(P<0.01),两种方法血气分析结果比较无显著意义(P>0.05)。结论:预设型动脉采血器操作简便,不良反应少,结果准确,值得临床应用推广。
Objective ： To compare the clinical effects of arterial blood drawing with BD preset artery blood collect and common injector. Methods ： To compare BD arterial blood drawing with preset artery blood collect and common injector for 80 patients at the same time, compare happen rate of vein blood drawing, success rates of puncture by once, happen rate of mixed air, happen rate of haematoma and extravasated blood in puncture site, the wounds press- ing time after blood sampling, pain level and results of blood gas analysis. Results：Preset artery blood collect was obvious low common injector in happen rate of vein blood drawing, happen rate of mixed air, happen rate of haematoma and extravasated blood in puncture site, pain level and the wounds pressing time after blood sampling （ P 〈 0.01 ） . There was no difference between results of blood gas analysis off two kinds of blood preparation compared （ P 〉 0. 05）. Conclusion：Preset artery blood collect is simple in operate, and then have little bad response,this method should be used in clinical practice.
出处
《护理实践与研究》
2010年第15期1-3,共3页
Nursing Practice and Research
关键词
BD预设型动脉采血器
普通注射器
动脉采血
比较
BD preset artery blood collect
Common injector
Arterial blood drawing
Comparison
